 | | Re: ok, lets play this again, what sets should we see in November —Scott Edward Sanburn
|
| | | (...) Well, whatever. What do you think it is then? It is there, I have seen the Special Edition 50x times now. It is the Outrider, Lucas did put it in there as a reference to the game. Scott S. -- Systems Administrator-Affiliated Engineers -> (URL) (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: ok, lets play this again, what sets should we see in November —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | | (...) And I've seen a small blob that is vaguely Outrider-shaped many times. Give me a clear picture, and then I'll believe it all you want. ~Mark (24 years ago, 7-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: ok, lets play this again, what sets should we see in November —Scott Edward Sanburn
|
| | | | | | (...) the (...) there (...) Well, Mark, Idon't what else to say except you might want to get your eyesight checked, because I see the Outrider, not a "blob which vaguely resembled the Outrider." It was not in the originals, and they put it in there (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: ok, lets play this again, what sets should we see in November —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | | | (...) about (...) what it (...) I'm not upset. You're the one throwing the insults. (eyesight) I am simply skeptical until I see clear proof. I frame-by-framed Ep. 1 on my VCR at home, and the ship that everyone says is the Outrider is just too (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: ok, lets play this again, what sets should we see in November —Selçuk Göre
|
| | | | | | (...) You are fighting for nothing guys..:-) The Outrider is there (not in Ep.1, by the way, in special edition of Ep.4, I think it's just a typo but, just for the other case) whether it is clear or not. The "Behind The Magic" CD from the Lucas (...) (24 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: ok, lets play this again, what sets should we see in November —Aaron West
|
| | | | | | | (...) I think we have to have at least on good tiff per month in the Star Wars section. Otherwise, it can't seem to support itself. We are all an emotional bunch when it comes to our perrsonal knowledge on this topic, I only discovered this year (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: ok, lets play this again, what sets should we see in November —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | | | | | (...) emotional (...) Heh. People seem to get really upset when you express an opinion about Star Wars that is skeptical or slightly negative. I love it too, but I'm also able to look at it objectively from time to time. Consider all the things that (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: ok, lets play this again, what sets should we see in November —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | | | Ah, well, I don't have the Behind the Magic CD because Lucasarts has chosen to ignore the Mac platform. Thanks for the official source. That's all I wanted. ~Mark (...) vaguely (...) upset (...) on (...) just (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: ok, lets play this again, what sets should we see in November —Dave Johann
|
| | | | (...) checked both). Whether or not it is the Outrider is irrelevant. If it wasn't included in the original version, then it wasn't important. Now, if Lucas had devoted a couple of minutes to it, then we'd be talking. My point is this: Lucas may (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
