Subject:
|
Re: Princess Leia up close and personal
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Tue, 2 May 2000 09:39:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1129 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Jeff Jardine writes:
> Here's my take on the matter: Jar Jar was kept in the film for the purpose of
> comic relief and making kids giggle. He had no relevance to the plot at all.
> That is what makes his presence different from the other films. In the first
> movie, the droids were the comic relief and closest parallel to Jar Jar, yet
> still had the feel of real characters and were instrumental to the plot. In
> ESB, Yoda comes the closest, and was IMO the perfect balance of comedy, kid-
> friendly cutseyness, genuineness, and appeal to older audiences. In ROTJ, it
> was, of course, the Ewoks. I'm still bitter about adding teddy bears as
> characters, but at least they were relevant to the plot, and there was some
> social commentary about technology and culture. The Gungun race definitely
> could have been included without Jar Jar. His character is something I might
> expect from Disney.
>
> I thought there were significant differences between the first film and
> Episode I. The big difference between the droids and Jar Jar is one. I can
> confidently say we will never see charred human remains again, like we did in
> Star Wars - not that I want to, it's just symbolic of the changes. Star Wars
> was huge because it had huge universal (young and old) appeal. Episode I had
> huge kid appeal. I certainly would *not* like to see R rated Star Wars films
> (although I'm sure they'd be awesome!), but rather films with the same
> universal appeal as the original. Unfortunately, this is a very difficult,
> maybe impossible task.
>
> I'll take this opportunity to introduce myself. I'm Jeff and I just started
> collecting SW Lego last fall. Last time I had a new Lego set was the early
> 80's, before I was even in my teens. Sorry for such a long message, and I
> hope I don't come off as a crotchety grump!
>
> Jeff J
Hi Jeff -- good to hear from another SWLego/Lugnet Dark Ages escapee.
theforce.net posited an interesting theory a while ago, in an attempt to
answer the eternal question "Jarjar Binks -- why?"
http://www.theforce.net/jedicouncil/editorials/060899.shtml
--dave
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Princess Leia up close and personal
|
| (...) Hello - I'm new. Here's my take on the matter: Jar Jar was kept in the film for the purpose of comic relief and making kids giggle. He had no relevance to the plot at all. That is what makes his presence different from the other films. In the (...) (25 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
