Subject:
|
Re: Senator Palpintine / Emperor
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Thu, 24 Feb 2000 16:12:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
498 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Eric Joslin writes:
> In lugnet.starwars, James Brown writes:
>
> > <controversy> You're trying to tell us that SW isn't predictable? Next,
> > you'll claim Lucas isn't pandering to the masses...</controversy>
> >
> > (tongue in cheek)
>
> Actually, I'd say that Lucas isn't pandering to the masses. Millions of whiny
> fanboys would love it if Jar Jar Binks weren't in Episode II, and yet he will
> be.
Millions of whiny kids will love it if he is. But I'm going to stop now
before this denegerates into another "Ewoks are cool" "Ewoks are stupid"
spiraling thread of despair.
James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Senator Palpintine / Emperor
|
| (...) Oh, it won't go that far. Ewoks are dumb, Jar Jar is dumb... I haven't even ever met any kids who like Jar Jar. I find him midly amusing, but if I had my druthers, there wouldn't be any screen time wasted on him. I just find it difficult to (...) (24 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | Re: Senator Palpintine / Emperor
|
| Just to add my useless two cents ... I consider Lucas to be the greatest example of anti-pandering there is. He financed the production of Episode I (and ROTJ, I believe) with his own money, for that express purpose: so that he could do exactly (...) (24 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Senator Palpintine / Emperor
|
| (...) Actually, I'd say that Lucas isn't pandering to the masses. Millions of whiny fanboys would love it if Jar Jar Binks weren't in Episode II, and yet he will be. eric (24 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
