Subject:
|
Re: Odd taxonomy question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Tue, 26 Jan 1999 16:32:42 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm/Spamcake/.org
|
Viewed:
|
625 times
|
| |
|
|
Matthew Miller <mattdm@mattdm.org> wrote:
> I dunno. I always throw those little monkeys in with the minifigs...
For clarity: not that droids are little monkeys. Just that they're similar
in their not-quite-minifigness.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Odd taxonomy question
|
| Matthew Miller wrote in message ... (...) Monkeys have been called pseudo-figs or quasi-figs by some, since they're more than just one-piece animals but less than mini-figs. Jesse ___...___ Jesse The Jolly Jingoist Looking for answers? Read the (...) (26 years ago, 26-Jan-99, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | Re: Odd taxonomy question
|
| Also sprach Matthew Miller: : For clarity: not that droids are little monkeys. Just that they're similar : in their not-quite-minifigness. quasi-figs, then ... posable figures that are not minifigs ... horses, R2, the monkeys all qualify ... but the (...) (26 years ago, 2-Feb-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
