Subject:
|
Re: Odd taxonomy question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Tue, 26 Jan 1999 15:12:50 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm=ihatespam=.org
|
Viewed:
|
606 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> It's even worse when the red 'R2 Unit'[3] is thrown in for
> consideration. This one isn't a main character, doesn't even have a
> name, and is made out of more-or-less reusable parts.
I dunno. I always throw those little monkeys in with the minifigs...
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Odd taxonomy question
|
| Looking at the Star Wars sets, I'm wondering: how is R2-D2 categorized? It's[1] not a mini-fig. But it is a character, so it should be more than just parts.[2] It's even worse when the red 'R2 Unit'[3] is thrown in for consideration. This one isn't (...) (26 years ago, 26-Jan-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
