Subject:
|
Re: Titanic, was Lego Mania Magazine
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Fri, 28 May 1999 20:28:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
667 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Steve Berry writes:
> Also, Titanic wasn't a movie I would have taken
> a young child to, but I could see taking my 4 or 5 year-old son to see TPM.
> This might give TPM a better than average shot at overtaking Titanic.
I wouldn't take my 4 or 5 year-old. I'd wait until he was 9 or 10.
> Besides, look at all the great LEGO sets we're seeing due to Star Wars and
> the new movie! Geez, I certainly don't want to recreate scenes from Titanic
> with minifig versions of Leo and Kate. But, to each their own.
lol But you'll get no argument from me there.
-Tom McD.
when replying, sink the spamcake.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Titanic, was Lego Mania Magazine
|
| Mark and Ed, I'd have to disagree about Titanic. Granted we saw it on video and not at the theater, but I was not that impressed by the movie (although the visual effects were very impressive) and neither was my wife. I thought there were many (...) (25 years ago, 28-May-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
