To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.starwarsOpen lugnet.starwars in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Star Wars / 17677
17676  |  17678
Subject: 
Re: EP III questions (spoilers if you haven't seen it)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.starwars
Date: 
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:29:21 GMT
Viewed: 
5376 times
  
In lugnet.starwars, Dave Schuler wrote:
   In lugnet.starwars, Jordan Bradford wrote:
   Re: the lightsaber technique, when Lucas first created Star Wars the lightsabers were treated like broadswords from the middle ages, which is evident both in the fighting style and the fact that the blades are actually flat . . . watch closely in Ep. 4 and you’ll see this.

Well, yeah--that’s the mundane explanation. But what’s the in-story explanation?

Dave!

The theory I have seen most often is that evenly matched highly powerful force users will actually be limiting one another’s movement making such fanciful moves useless or dangerous. Consider in episode 3 when Obi-wan and Anakin face Count Dooku, at one point Dooku literally lifts up Obi-wan and hurls him across the room. When Anakin beat him, it was with the more straight on style. Even better of an example is Mace Windu versus Palpatine. Most of that fight was very restricted in movement comparitvely, leading to the conclusion that Mace was perhaps the most qualified Jedi Master to actually take down Palpatine. (Yoda’s fighting style is more limited by his size requiring the “flying tasmanian devil” style regardless, which could be why he couln’t win against palpatine but was able to easily beat Dooku who was weaker.) Then of course we come to Young Obi-wan versus Anakin which was a very athletic duel. Notice that Obi-wan was fighting a mostly defensive pattern the whole duel untill he was in a position to goad Anakin into making a foolish mistake. It was after all Anakin’s acrobatics that defeated him. So the long winded explanation finally makes its way to Old Obi-wan versus Darth Vader. They were both using very defensive styles and we never really see them let loose in all out combat because Obi-wan sacrificed himself. (Darth Vader didn’t really go on a “reckless” offensive like he had in his youth presumably remembering what got him in that suit in the first place.) It is actually kind of odd how well the older movies do mesh with the newer ones in that regard.

-Mike Petrucelli



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: EP III questions (spoilers if you haven't seen it)
 
(...) Well, yeah--that's the mundane explanation. But what's the in-story explanation? Dave! (18 years ago, 21-Aug-06, to lugnet.starwars, FTX)

8 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR