 | | Re: UCS Naboo Starfighter 2.0 —Gareth Bowler
|
| | | (...) Ignored again. So much for the great AFOL community. Won't be posting here any more. (22 years ago, 1-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.build)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: UCS Naboo Starfighter 2.0 —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | | (...) Wah. *plays air violin* ~GAMH (22 years ago, 1-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.build)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: UCS Naboo Starfighter 2.0 —Jon Palmer
|
| | | | | "Guybrush" <REMOVECAPSguybrush@nc.rr.com> wrote in message news:H4wMvF.AwM@lugnet.com... (...) section (...) Oh boo hoo. How childish. Perhaps if you didn't ONLY build Star Wars MOCs (oh pardon me, *customs*) over and over again. I have NEVER (...) (22 years ago, 1-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.build)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: UCS Naboo Starfighter 2.0 —Jon Palmer
|
| | | | | | Look everyone Gareth the Great sent me a touching reply via email. I'm going to stoop to his level and post it for all to see: (...) What a guy! (...) did (...) He's referring to something completely unrelated which occurred on FBTB. Look it up if (...) (22 years ago, 2-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.build)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: UCS Naboo Starfighter 2.0 —James Wilson
|
| | | | | | Jon, I think he'd like your stuff better if you called them "customs." James (22 years ago, 2-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.build)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: UCS Naboo Starfighter 2.0 —Chris Giddens
|
| | | | | (...) Dude. Some folk didn't see your post until today. And, you did give AMPLE time for people to respond. First post: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:27:03 GMT Second post: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 15:54:51 GMT And, you didn't post in the announce MOC group. (ya know (...) (22 years ago, 1-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.build)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: UCS Naboo Starfighter 2.0 —David Eaton
|
| | | | | (...) It's kinda sad-- I remember getting bummed my first couple times when I'd post a creation and not get any responses, but really, that's not why you should be posting. If you're posting because you're looking for praise, then I agree with you. (...) (22 years ago, 1-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.build)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: UCS Naboo Starfighter 2.0 —Stefan Garcia
|
| | | | | | (...) I agree with David. Gareth, your creations are awesome, but I didn't see this post until today. You have to give the online community some time to respond. And if they don't respond chill. Check to see if the post got highlighted or if you (...) (22 years ago, 1-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.build)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: UCS Naboo Starfighter 2.0 —David Eaton
|
| | | | | | | (...) You've got to be a Lugnet member using the web-interface in order to highlight or spotlight a post. You don't have to be a Lugnet member to post to Lugnet, but there are lots of cool tidbits you get for being a member ($10 fee currently) A (...) (22 years ago, 1-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.build)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: UCS Naboo Starfighter 2.0 —Stefan Garcia
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Ahh...cool, thanks. I'll eventually be a full member (Gareth, take note, your problem might just lie in your attitude). Right now I'm happy just being able to post. Thanks again. -Stefan- (22 years ago, 2-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.build)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: UCS Naboo Starfighter 2.0 —Gareth Bowler
|
| | | | | | Well, I'm glad I came back to read replies, if only for these two. As for negative feedback or questions, that's what I come here in search of. As nice as it is to hear "that's great" it doesn't help me build any better. When I first started posting (...) (22 years ago, 2-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.build)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: UCS Naboo Starfighter 2.0 —James Wilson
|
| | | | | | | (...) You're right. It's the 2 step approach you followed. Step 1: Post message about MOC Step 2: Post another message a day later bemoaning lack of feedback and tell group you're taking you ball and going home. But you're still here. If Lugnet (...) (22 years ago, 2-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.build)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: UCS Naboo Starfighter 2.0 —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | | | (...) Did it occur to you that perhaps a lot of the people who read Lugnet also read FBTB and might reply there? I think that generally people don't post in both places. In any case, making a drama queen "woe is me, I'm leaving whilst slamming the (...) (22 years ago, 2-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.build)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: UCS Naboo Starfighter 2.0 —James Wilson
|
| | | | | (...) Maybe you didn't realize that the "A" in AFOL stands for "Adult," not "Able-to-drop-everyt...Wars-MOC." I would guess that most of the _Adult_ readers of lugnet.starwars have other things to do. How 'bout developing an app that sits in my (...) (22 years ago, 1-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.build)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: UCS Naboo Starfighter 2.0 —Adrian Egli
|
| | | | | "Guybrush" <REMOVECAPSguybrush@nc.rr.com> wrote in message news:H4wMvF.AwM@lugnet.com... (...) section (...) For me, it's "OK, so I don't get any replys on LUGNET about a MOC. Let's see what's going on with the photos I put up on BrickShelf?" I (...) (22 years ago, 2-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.build)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: UCS Naboo Starfighter 2.0 —Tony Alexander
|
| | | | (...) Your loss dude. I have to totally disagree with your perception of the "great AFOL community". See my post here: (URL) . I've seen lots of positives here, and have been glad to have this online community to share with and learn from. Much like (...) (22 years ago, 2-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.build)
|
| | | | |
