 | | Re: Episode II named —Markham Carroll
|
| | | Stephen F Roberts <wubwub@wildlink.com> wrote in message news:6hj0nt8o9982tbg...4ax.com... (...) the (...) release in (...) time (...) Ugh! (...) "Attack of the Clones" seems to me to be some corny sci-fi flick you'd find in Mystery Sience Theature (...) (23 years ago, 20-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Episode II named —Stephen F. Roberts
|
| | | | | (...) ...That's what I was thinking! ...My current theory is that George is just playing with us... He'll announce the "real" title like a month out... --- wubwub wubwub@wildlink.com jains.has.it <-- Jain's Guide www.sitcatsit.com <-- a guy and his (...) (23 years ago, 29-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Episode II named —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | | | | | (...) Of course, that is exactly what people were saying about Phantom Menace... ;D Jeff (23 years ago, 29-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Episode II named —James Simpson
|
| | | | | | (...) That's what I've hoped since 1983 when RoTJ came out. George is just playing with us. Those ewoks are just stand-ins. He'll bring the Wookies out when the *real* movie is released. james, who shudders at the image of Lego ewoks. (23 years ago, 29-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Episode II named —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | (...) Gee, by that criteria these movies may actually have been well-named because MST3K is undoubtedly where they are headed! I have seen Episode I exactly once, maybe someday I will see the subsequent films for free on TV or something because I do (...) (23 years ago, 29-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Episode II named —James Simpson
|
| | | | | | (...) Yes, but one can still hope that George will recover the artistic vision of ANH and TESB. I won't pilgrimage to the theaters with the same zealous optimism as I had when Ep 1 was released, but I still look forward to Ep. 2's release. If (...) (23 years ago, 29-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Episode II named —Jaco van der Molen
|
| | | | | | People! If you want to discuss about the title please go to (URL) continue there. IMHO the main topic here should be "Star Wars LEGO" and not "Star Wars". Furthermore I have done some research on how and why George Lucas named this film AOTC and I (...) (23 years ago, 30-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Episode II named —Scott Sanburn
|
| | | | | | Jaco & All, (...) Well, this is what the website states as the criteria for this group: "LEGO®/Star Wars®: products (information, opinions, reviews, licensing issues, etc.); building (settings, contexts, characters, projects, models, layouts, plans, (...) (23 years ago, 30-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Episode II named —Markham Carroll
|
| | | | | | Scott E. Sanburn <ssanburn@indalex.com> wrote in message news:GIvoC2.Jzr@lugnet.com... (...) like (...) LOL, what would be the point of a SW LEGO group if we can't discuss SW? : 'p -- Booga Who needs sanity when you have iNsAniTy?! All your Lego (...) (23 years ago, 31-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Episode II named —Kyle Henneberque
|
| | | | (...) I think George is just trying to get back at a lot of people. A lot of people were upset with the title of TPM because they said it was too vague. Some people couldn't figure out that Palpatine was the actual "Menace" of the movie and not (...) (23 years ago, 31-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
