 | | Re: That AT-ST Scout Walker.
|
|
(...) I do not wish to argue over something that was my opinion (I never stated it as a fact). And yes I still think the same way about it. ......, Jay Cal (24 years ago, 28-Oct-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: That AT-ST Scout Walker.
|
|
(...) Do you really believe that? Come on man... they did it because it was CHEAP. ~Mark "Muffin Head" Sandlin (24 years ago, 28-Oct-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: What is with the Technic Stormtrooper?
|
|
(...) This is one of the greatest things about the variety of elements LEGO produces, IMHO -- there aren't (obviously) an infinite variety of LEGO shapes, but they've thought things through carefully enough to make a very decent variety that can (...) (24 years ago, 28-Oct-00, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: That AT-ST Scout Walker.
|
|
(...) <snip> MY $0.02: I think as an AT-ST this set blows putty balls. As a $9.99 Lego Set however it is yet another awsome addition to the Star Wars line. I did WANT a strike force of wookies but I NEED Imerials. [sigh] -Lord Insanity (24 years ago, 28-Oct-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: That AT-ST Scout Walker.
|
|
(...) Good point, the echo troop would have had about the same familiarity as a chewie to a kid, even if the driver didn't. -Scot (URL) (24 years ago, 28-Oct-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: That AT-ST Scout Walker.
|
|
(...) I think they could have at least made it 15 dollars, replace Chewie with an Imperial officer, and include an Echo troop (same as that comes with the Snowspeeder). -- Andrew, Agent 0007 (24 years ago, 28-Oct-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: That AT-ST Scout Walker.
|
|
(...) All I can say is that the TLG version may not look like much it has much better moving leg action then my AT-ST model ( (URL) ). But the detailing could have been done better. The reason TLG threw in chewie instead of a Imp. at-st driver is (...) (24 years ago, 28-Oct-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: That AT-ST Scout Walker.
|
|
(...) Uh...no. The "real" AT-ST had a box-like mechanism in between the head and legs that housed a weight shifter and motors to move the head up, down, left, and right. They totally skipped this, so not only does it look unlike it is supposed to, (...) (24 years ago, 28-Oct-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: That AT-ST Scout Walker.
|
|
(...) Why does everyone here hate Slizers? I have two Throwbots, and I think they are great. They are better constructed than most System stuff, with gears that make them do things. And they are a great building toy too, I actually do Throwbot (...) (24 years ago, 28-Oct-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: That AT-ST Scout Walker.
|
|
(...) A "correct" AT-ST would have more detail, be entirely gray etc. A "correct" Millenium Falcon would be the same... But the system Star Wars is intended for children, and given that, I still feel that TLG is doing a great job with these models. (...) (24 years ago, 28-Oct-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
