 | | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
|
|
(...) Hmm... Why would R2D2 have need for an inflatable Leia? If anyone had a reason to have one, that would be R4D5, but he isn't included with the set. Or maybe that isn't the case... Ol' Obi-Wan is probably just doing some of his cross dressing (...) (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
|
|
(...) it (...) Death (...) island (...) How do you know it is not an inflatable Leia? "It's not my nose, it's a false one," MPFC: Holy Grail Aaron (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
|
|
Hello, I think it is okay for LEGO to make toys that are for kids and enjoyable to the collector crowd. I will give credit to LEGO for the model they have given us on both the toy and collector side. As a toy it satisfies all of the play (...) (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
|
|
(...) leia, it would have obi wan instead. (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
|
|
(...) like I (...) resource for (...) Hey, good idea, except how do you know that the set isn't going *to* the Death Star :) Ah well, you can get (old) Obi-Wan's in a relatively cheap set, so I wouldn't be worrying. And another thing, Obi Wan didn't (...) (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
|
|
(...) I hate to tell you this, but obi wan died during the fight on the death star, therefore he isnt on the falcon in this case. (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
|
|
Well I have said it before and I guess I have to say it again. The external scale of the life-sized falcon used in the movies is 40 percent smaller than the internal sets that were used. TLC's falcon is a near perfect external scale. Of course this (...) (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
|
|
(...) And where's Obi-Wan? I could have sworn he was on it. =P -- Agent 0007 AIM: Agent O0O7 (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
|
|
(...) Of course there are people here who would buy it. The real question is, are there *enough* people in the world at large to make it worth designing, marketing, soliciting, producing, and shipping? Probably not. Anyone who is disappointed with (...) (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
|
|
(...) Umm, yes. A UCS MF would be horrible expensive, but I'm guessing it'd be over 2500-3000 pieces. That's a lot. -Chris (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
|
|
(...) i agree it is the only set that i know that has c3po and leia... and i think that lego did the best that they could... would any of you buy an enhanced better bigger more accurate one for more than double the price? -James Walker (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
|
|
Its kind of funny I thought it looked bigger in the adds! Did anyone else notice this?? ---...--- (...) (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
|
|
Remember, Legos are TOYS, and they are made for KIDS. Don't get me wrong, I wish Lego would target us AFOLs, but they don't, and so we have to take what they give us or create our own models. That is, after all, why we like Legos. I don't have (...) (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
|
|
Knowing me, I'd probably buy it if I could, but I'd end up dismantling it like I did the Tie/advanced and one of my B-wings. It looks like a better resource for good minifigs and large grey pieces if you ask me. (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
|
|
Well, by "kid" I meant ages 8-12 as it shows on the box. I'm glad that you have taste, however. :^) ~Mark (...) AFOLS (...) (24 years ago, 13-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Mark Sandlin writes: SNIPP! (...) I have to disagree with you here, as a 15 year old, I would toss this thing out a window if I MOCed (is this a verb?) it. You are totally correct on all other points, poor design, POOPness, and (...) (24 years ago, 13-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Millennium Falcon Opinion
|
|
Wow, having looked at all the photos from various sources, I have to say that I probably won't be buying the Millennium Falcon set. What a disappointment. TLG did such a good job on sets like the X-Wing and the Snowspeeder, and even Slave I... the (...) (24 years ago, 13-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Millennium Falcon--PS
|
|
The ship is the Lego Star Wars #7190 set, not one he created on his own. Sorry, I forgot to mention that. There are a lot of hidden compartments on the ship and the mini-figures are really neat especially Chewbacca. C-3P0 is of a different type of (...) (24 years ago, 13-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Pics of Millennium Falcon
|
|
Just wanted to share with you two pictures of the Millennium Falcon my son built. He just loves the ship! The ship is mostly made up of light gray bricks, but I think the lighting and my brown table make it look tan. (URL) (24 years ago, 13-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: new ideas for rock raider sets?
|
|
Death Star Set?? Got any pictures? ---...--- (...) Star (...) (24 years ago, 13-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
