 | | Re: Incorrect Links on SW Sidebar
|
|
(...) What are you talking about, Kevin? Nobody here was joking. Did you even read Rob's entire post, or any of the other posts in this thread for that matter, before you replied, or did you just jump into the conversation halfway and read only mine (...) (20 years ago, 18-Jan-05, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.admin.curators)
|
| |
| | Re: Incorrect Links on SW Sidebar
|
|
(...) I have to agree on this one; I enjoy your MOCs but I stopped visiting the website long ago because it just takes too long to load! Peter (20 years ago, 18-Jan-05, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.admin.curators)
|
| |
| | Re: Incorrect Links on SW Sidebar
|
|
(...) Once upon a time, there was a thing called a "joke"... Ugh. ~Kevoh (20 years ago, 18-Jan-05, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.admin.curators)
|
| |
| | Re: Incorrect Links on SW Sidebar
|
|
(...) OK guys, I just never knew THAT was his real name. Of all the names I see on a daily basis, that one is not one that I've ever seen used before as a first OR last name. Apologies to Amado if that is his given name. But *Amado*, please (...) (20 years ago, 18-Jan-05, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.admin.curators)
|
| |
| | Re: Incorrect Links on SW Sidebar
|
|
(...) Plus, Rob, you quoted his name in your post: ======= || (...) /\ || || || || || || || ===...=== -Mike Crowley (20 years ago, 18-Jan-05, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.admin.curators)
|
| |
| | Re: Incorrect Links on SW Sidebar
|
|
(...) Rob, You can find Mr. Pinlac's real name (URL), on the line that is labeled Author: -- just below the Subject: line. It is also contained in the X-Real-Life-Name header of the (URL) raw article content>. --Todd (20 years ago, 18-Jan-05, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.admin.curators, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Incorrect Links on SW Sidebar
|
|
(...) Would the real ACPin, please stand up? What in the universe IS your real name? Do you get self gratification by having this aura of mystery around yourself? Granted, you have *some* cool MOC's on your over large website (compensating for (...) (20 years ago, 18-Jan-05, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.admin.curators)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Taun-Taun
|
|
This is another excellent creature from the Star Wars movies. It impresses with all needed details to make it a perfect Tauntaun. Especially original are horns, feet and the embedded saddle assembly. Way to go Bruce! :-) (20 years ago, 17-Jan-05, to lugnet.starwars, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: RAID with RHAAT
|
|
Just a comparison pic of the two vehicles to show some design commonality. (URL) AC (20 years ago, 17-Jan-05, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Incorrect Links on SW Sidebar
|
|
To whom it may concern, Thanks for bringing back my name on the SW MOCs list. However the link is incorrect, can somebody please change it to (URL) we're on the subject of incorrect links for the SW sidebar, the following I believe are also dead (...) (20 years ago, 17-Jan-05, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.admin.curators)
|
| |
| | Re: 7263 Box Question (from CountBlockula's Brickshelf pictures)
|
|
(...) Thanks for the reply Mike. I thought you might reply yourself but I didn't know if you spent more time at FBTB than here and might not see it. (...) That would be cool but I doubt it. I bet it was just a typo, or maybe they were going to (...) (20 years ago, 17-Jan-05, to lugnet.starwars, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 7263 Box Question (from CountBlockula's Brickshelf pictures)
|
|
(...) Hi, Paul. Even though it says on the outside of the box "Instructions included for three models," the instruction booklet only contains instructions on how to build the TIE. Like 7256 Jedi Starfighter and Vulture Droid (the ROTS set I managed (...) (20 years ago, 17-Jan-05, to lugnet.starwars, FTX)
|
| |
| | 7263 Box Question (from CountBlockula's Brickshelf pictures)
|
|
Hi all, I just noticed CountBlockula (aka Mike Crowley) posted images of the 7263 box on Brickshelf. I'm interested in the light-up lightsaber though less interested in paying for another TIE-fighter. What really caught my eye was this picture: (...) (20 years ago, 16-Jan-05, to lugnet.starwars, FTX)
|
| |
| | fixing design flaws in #4483 (AT-AT)
|
|
I got set 4483 (the AT-AT) for Christmas, and while it looks great (at least from below), it has zero play value, mostly because it falls apart when you touch it. Many of the design flaws (see (URL)) are actually fixable -- some of them pretty (...) (20 years ago, 15-Jan-05, to lugnet.starwars, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Taun-Taun
|
|
(...) Nice Bruce! I especially like the size relation to the minifigs and the use of the horse saddle. Matt (20 years ago, 14-Jan-05, to lugnet.starwars, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Taun-Taun
|
|
This taun-taun is so beautiful, it brought a single tear to my eye. (20 years ago, 12-Jan-05, to lugnet.starwars, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Taun-Taun
|
|
Nice Work Bruce. It's got a ton of Personality. My favorite touch is the toenail! -Jon "Do the TaunTauns have Large Talons?"-Napoleon Skywalker (20 years ago, 11-Jan-05, to lugnet.starwars, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Taun-Taun
|
|
(...) It looks great! The one thing that's missing is articulation... it looks pretty rigid. (2 URLs) Tony Hafner (URL) www.hafhead.com> (20 years ago, 11-Jan-05, to lugnet.starwars, FTX)
|
| |
| | Crummy?
|
|
CAUTION: THIS MAY RUIN YOUR DAY OR MAKE YOU VERY ANGRY AT ME AND CAUSE UNSETTLING FEELINGS etc...... Is it me or does it look like lego is getting cheap. I mean the only two sets that I would buy right away are the ARC-170 out of loyalty (and it (...) (20 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Taun-Taun
|
|
(...) Awesome Bruce...Great job! Justin (20 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.starwars, FTX)
|
