 | | Re: Jabba's Sail Barge and Episode 2 customs
|
|
(...) The Sail Barge is awesome, like all of your stuff. Now for the requisite SW geek nitpick: At the time of the battle on the Sail Barge, Luke was not wearing the black glove on his hand. That's when it was blasted. Jeff J (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Mega high-res Picture of 10026
|
|
(...) Interesting picture, unfortunately it doesn't pop up in a window with a scroll bar, so I can only see the top half by moving the window around. Frank (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Mega high-res Picture of 10026
|
|
(...) Thanks for the huge picture. I think I may have spoted a new peice. Atleast one that I havent seen before. If you look at the slope part under the whole conopy. It seems to be a 2x9 multi angle slope. We wont know for sure untill we get are (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Mega high-res Picture of 10026
|
|
(...) LOL, we must have too much time on our hands John, I tried to do the same thing and no where did I find a reflection of the photographer :) jt (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: NEW MOC: Bespin Duel
|
|
Thanks a lot, guys. Much appreciated. I agree with George and Bruce; we barely see any "location" MOCs at all and even less from ESB. I'll start work on some other parts of the duel pretty soon. Jason- I probably would've had this MOC out about a (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Mega high-res Picture of 10026
|
|
Interesting to see such a detailed closeup. The photographer was obviously very careful - chrome surfaces like that are great places to go looking for pictures of the photographer, and he(she) is nowhere to be found. JB (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Mega high-res Picture of 10026
|
|
(...) IMO, such a picture is useless - it doesn't fit on my screen (1600x1200 - the image is close to double that!). Especially since the guide picture popup doesn't enable scrollbars. Maybe we should change that? On Windows (which I'm forced to use (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.db.scans)
|
| |
| | Mega high-res Picture of 10026
|
|
I just got permission to use some pictures of 10026. It includes a very high res pic that may not tell you much more of anything, but for a limited time, it'll be the pic in the LUGNET Set Database: (URL) I'll swap in a normal-res version, because (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: 10026...Price versus Parts
|
|
(...) Hey, yeah, there are some other parts in there that are usefull to aren't there? I haven't seen much potential for anything but the chrom...I'm a mecha guy and thus don't yet have any real use for the curvy parts (maybe when someone else does (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: 10026...Price versus Parts
|
|
(...) You would? I don't know if I would, but, then again I never got the original fighter so I didn't have the joy of it's parts (dang huh?) (...) Stop...<slober>... The idea of it is...<drool>...to much...<heavy breathing>...Control...im...There (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Pics of 10026 - SE Naboo Starfighter
|
|
This model is very nice, I can't justify it's price just due to the chrome. The Vintage Aircraft two for 10% off deal seems a better purchase at this time. I couldn't really justify the price of the Blockade Runner either, so I suppose this isn't (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: 10026...Price versus Parts
|
|
I would pay double the old price for 3033's also. But it seems to me that the value associated with that purhcase is far greater than that of the 10026. If TLC released a tub of all chrome technic parts, that is a different story all together. :) (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: 10026...Price versus Parts
|
|
Heck, I'd pay double the old price for 3033s even without any chrome plated parts. But just imagine a chrome plated tub full of juicy new chrome plated technic parts ... drool ... let me get my cheque book JB - happy lab rat (Sorry to be a bit off (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: 10026...Price versus Parts
|
|
I have to agree with you here Tim. Since the parts used in the stand are also used in lots of other sets, that certainly wouldn't justify doubling the price. Also, the rare chrome parts doesn't add that much value to the set unless you are (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: 10026...Price versus Parts
|
|
Ahhhhhhh...so we are just the lab rats of this whole process.........I wonder whats next....some more sets with raised prices and rare pieces? <scary James Bond like music in the background.....> (...) May the Brick be with you * Tim * ___...___ GET (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: 10026...Price versus Parts
|
|
IMO, no. Most of the increase in parts goes to the display stand anyway, right? and can it really cost $20 more to manufacture probably less than (help me out here) 2 dozen chrome parts? No lego is simply asking more cause they know psychopaths like (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: 10026...Price versus Parts
|
|
But I just realized there would be no modification in production process, cuz they' have been doing chrome for a while, just not on a grand scale. This is the stuff that would be neat to have answered by a Lego rep. -Matt . (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: 10026...Price versus Parts
|
|
(...) If you look at the gold disk from the Millenium Throwbot/Slizer, the bottom is tan. This fits in with the "the parts have to be made specially for chrome". I think they need new moulds as well to account for the thickness of the coating, but I (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: 10026...Price versus Parts
|
|
(...) Pardon my cynicism Greg, but TLC has hit their bullseye dead center. As I mentioned in a previous post, I believe 10026 is a product of clever timing and research, and we are once again the lab rats. That's fine with me, as I don't object to (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | 10026...Price versus Parts
|
|
I am curious what the general opinion is about the significant price increase of this set. It seems to me that the increase is rather high compared to the part count of the set. Are the chrome parts enough to justify the price of the set? Thanks for (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
