Subject:
|
Re: 10026...Price versus Parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Thu, 20 Jun 2002 16:33:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
449 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 16:01:23 GMT "Greg Muri" <gmuri1@yahoo.com> writes:
> I have to agree with you here Tim. Since the parts used in the stand
> are
> also used in lots of other sets, that certainly wouldn't justify
> doubling
> the price. Also, the rare chrome parts doesn't add that much value
> to the
> set unless you are specifically looking for those parts. I think
> the number
> of people that will buy the set specifically for the chrome is
> rather low
> compared to the overall sales. I for one want it for some of the
> other
> parts and will likely end up selling off the chrome parts.
Hey, yeah, there are some other parts in there that are usefull to aren't
there? I haven't seen much potential for anything but the chrom...I'm a
mecha guy and thus don't yet have any real use for the curvy parts (maybe
when someone else does something with them I'll realize their potential,
but not now...) I mainly want the chrome, even though there is very
little of it. I might wait though, and see if lego comes out with sets
that have chrome in a larger quantity. Oh, BTW, did this reply start a
new thread again, I've been having some trouble with gettin my messages
to reply in the same thread...Thanx! :^)
May the Brick be with you
* Tim *
> Greg
>
> "Tim Rice" <blackstarbricks@juno.com> wrote in message
> news:20020620.083328.-1019881.1.BlackStarBricks@juno.com...
> > IMO, no. Most of the increase in parts goes to the display stand anyway,
> > right? and can it really cost $20 more to manufacture probably less than
> > (help me out here) 2 dozen chrome parts? No lego is simply asking more
> > cause they know psychopaths like me will pay more for chrome parts they
> > can't get anywhere else. The old rule of selling stuff: its only worth as
> > much as you can get someone to pay for it, and in this canse, Lego can
> > get some people to pay alot for it.
> > May the Brick be with you
> > * Tim *
> > On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 14:24:32 GMT "Greg Muri" <gmuri1@yahoo.com> writes:
> > > I am curious what the general opinion is about the significant price
> > > increase of this set. It seems to me that the increase is rather
> > > high
> > > compared to the part count of the set. Are the chrome parts enough
> > > to
> > > justify the price of the set?
> > >
> > > Thanks for you opinion,
> > > Greg
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________
> > GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
> > Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
> > Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
> > http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.
May the Brick be with you
* Tim *
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: 10026...Price versus Parts
|
| While I don't particularily like the price increase, I think it is smart on Lego's part. The number of *drooling* posts is staggering. Surely Lego anticipated that? That being said, knowing that many many collectors will purchase the set, almost (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
2 Messages in This Thread: ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: 10026...Price versus Parts -Keith Kirchoff (20-Jun-02 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|