 | | A-Wing, X-Wing MOC
|
| Finally, I've managed to post something! I built these last summer, and I've lost a lot of the pictures, and I'll try to find more, but this is one of the better ones unfortunately. I like the A-Wing better, the fins are angled, adn the cockpit has (...) (26 years ago, 7-Jan-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | A-Wing, X-Wing MOC
|
| Finally, I've managed to post something! I built these last summer, and I've lost a lot of the pictures, and I'll try to find more, but this is one of the better ones unfortunately. I like the A-Wing better, the fins are angled, adn the cockpit has (...) (26 years ago, 7-Jan-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: Imperial Shuttle
|
| In lugnet.starwars, Zak Arntson writes: <snip> (...) <snip> Hi Zak, You are correct in thinking the wings should fold down lower. I switched the 2x10's with 1x10's. It works and looks fine. Now, with only a 1x10, there is less support for the wing, (...) (26 years ago, 7-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Allow me to introduce myself
|
| Well, I was introduced to Lugnet by Micheal Lachmann (the creator of MLCAD) a while ago but I never thought of actually introducing myself. As you can tell, My name is Joseph H. Cardana aka Darth Anadrac. My website is anadrac.homepage.com if it (...) (26 years ago, 7-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.people, lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Imperial Shuttle
|
| Before I go into a small problem I had with the shuttle, here's my thoughts: It's a really cool set! The thing is almost entirely white, which is a good contrast against the black and blue tie fighters available. The top fin is much more stable than (...) (26 years ago, 7-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: Who else wants an AT-AT?
|
| (...) The even sadder thing is that the snowspeeder is one of the few SW models Lego's made that's actually LARGER than it 'should' be-- making the required AT-AT foot even bigger :) If I recall correctly, the 7130 is 18 studs long, making it about (...) (26 years ago, 6-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: Who else wants an AT-AT?
|
| If you consider that LEGO uses existing pieces where they can, I can imagine each foot would use one of those tiny "saucer" pieces like the AT-ST foot, or the Millenium Falcon landing gear. Which would be fine, because if it were TOO big, yikes! I'd (...) (26 years ago, 6-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: Who else wants an AT-AT?
|
| (...) Is anyone else a member of the Star Wars Fan club? I've written a question to Steve Sansweet about the scales used (actual scales of models) and represented (how big they are supposed to be). "If" I get an answer maybe we could get closer to a (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: Technic C-3P0: My First Impression
|
| Hi, I think I read in here of someone w/ the same strange problem as me: In my Stormtrooper box was a 3P0!! I called lego to tell them of the mistake. I didn't mind this though, since the S.T. looks like...well....CRAP!! :7) Jono (26 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: Who else wants an AT-AT?
|
| BUT if you go strictly by the fact that the foot of the AT-AT covers the Snowspeeder and take into account the size of the LEGO Snowspeeder. In order to accomplish the AT-AT foot being the right size it would HAVE to be HUGE. This would also support (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
|
