|
| | Re: Who else wants an AT-AT?
|
| 1st rule: NEVER go by what you see in the movie!! In one scene, the AT-AT's could easily be 100 M tall, wheras in the scene when the foot steps on luke's snowspeeder, it is significantly smaller (to scale w/ the foot, maybe 10 M tall at the (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | Re: Star Wars Technic C-3PO & Stormtrooper
|
| "jamie hickey" <jamie75@cris.com> wrote in message news:G6Kstt.n1q@lugnet.com... (...) $35. (...) I saw them at Target, and 3pO is listed at 19.99. Hmmmmm... (24 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.technic)
| | | | Re: Who else wants an AT-AT?
|
| (...) I think that the general consensus we all reached was that LEGO will most likely offer that service based on a limited number and type of parts. ~Mark "Muffin Head" Sandlin (24 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | Re: Who else wants an AT-AT?
|
| (...) ... (...) I remember wanting to kill for that AT-AT when I was a kid. Anyway, if LEGO put out an AT-AT in a big box (size of UCS/Millenium Falcon) I'd buy one (or two, even). -Zak PS - I heard a rumor that LEGO.com was eventually going to have (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | Re: Who else wants an AT-AT?
|
| (...) Actually, going by the movies, an AT-AT's about 75 feet tall, which translates to about 525 mm in minifig scale which is about 65 studs tall... But 40 studs would about work for the often reported 50-feet height of the AT-AT, though... (...) (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | Re: Who else wants an AT-AT?
|
| (...) I would have thought that it might impact on sales of the Dark Side Developer's Kit (DSDK). I know they'd be very different models in appearance, but the big attraction of the DSDK is that it's a Lego AT-AT; that's why it takes centre image on (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | Re: 8007 versus 8008
|
| (...) A similar one, anyway: the new LOM value pack just arrived at Walmart here, and I found one on the shelf with a second copy of 7308, instead of the 7309. Too bad there's no cheap way to certify the shrinkwrap as original: I could probably get (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf)
| | | | Re: 8007 versus 8008
|
| Funny thing, I got them both at our TRU here in Binghamton NY today err yesterday now :). They were switched and still had the original seals. All parts, papers, ads, everything was there but they were switched. PS they had Cameraman from movie (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.us.ny.bin, lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.technic)
| | | | Re: 8007 versus 8008
|
| (...) Sorry, I meant "$39.9x". Cheers, Hao-yang Wang (24 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf)
| | | | 8007 versus 8008
|
| This evening, I bought a set of 8008, the Technic Stormtrooper, from the TRU near Highway 84. When I opened the box, surprisingly I found a C-3P0 inside, with the instructions and stickers, not the Stormtrooper. Interestingly, there were only (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf)
| |