|
|
 | | Re: 7106, 7126, 7166
|
| (...) I don't have a vadar minifig and don't intend on getting a set with one; could somebody post a link to a picture of the head under the helmet? (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: 7151 Sith Infiltrator $10
|
| (...) Excellent! Thanks for the notice! They were still available as of 10-ish MST, but etoys was running really s l o w. James (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: 7151 Sith Infiltrator $10
|
| (...) Thanks for the notice - I just ordered 20 of them. Shipping came to $20, so I guess I paid $11 each, but still not bad. (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: 7151 Sith Infiltrator $10
|
| For those of you that don't have it, I highly recommend this set. Its a great "gray" parts pack, and the model looks a lot more cool when you build it than it does on the box. Daniel Barrett <danielbarrett@earthlink.net> wrote in message (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | 7151 Sith Infiltrator $10
|
| Etoys has the Infiltrator for $10 a set. I just ordered 3 of them and with shipping it came to $40 and some change. At the $10 price it's difficult to pass on a few of these. Daniel (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | More 2001 Star Wars, Studios, and LOM
|
| Hi all; Found some more Star Wars at Wal-Mart in Ottumwa, IA. <set:7127 7127 AT-ST> was $9.97 USD <set:7126 7126 Battle Droid Carrier> was $9.97 USD <set:7106 7106 Droid Escape> was $6.77 USD <set:7166 7166 Imperial Shuttle> was $34.88 USD Studios: (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Rest of Stwar Wars Ssyem line found in Canada
|
| Found the rest of the System line at TRU in Oakville yesterday (Watto's Junkyard, Shuttle). I think they were 10% off but no sign was seen (Watto $62.98, Shuttle $35.98). I came to this conclusion when I saw Watto as Zellers Burlington Mall today. (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: 7106, 7126, 7166
|
| Jeff Johnston <sakura@mediaone.net> wrote in message news:G5sC88.725@lugnet.com... (...) fearsome, (...) He is? He looks very unsavory to me, grey skin, wrinkles, etc... (...) as (...) That is true, and some of Legos preliminary models have looked (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: 7106, 7126, 7166
|
| (...) Oh, come on. It's *LEGO* for Pete's sake. Even Darth Vader is 'cute' as a LEGO minifig. (...) I don't know if it's a question of talent or not. Judging from some of the stuff I've seen, it might well be a question of the limitations they have (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: star wars creations in lego
|
| That would be Eric Kingsley's page, The Scythe Squadron, one of the best Star Wars Lego sites I've seen (I'm still waiting for him to show us how to modify the B-Wing like he did!!! Damn they're good!) Here's the link: (URL) on Eric, show us how (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: 7106, 7126, 7166
|
| CUTE??? Its an Imperial AT-ST!!! The designers designed it to look fearsome, deadly, and intimidating! Aauugghh! Ahem. Well I don't think it looks cute, I do think it is fairly good considering the price, and the fact that Lego Designers obviously (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: Review: 7127 AT-ST
|
| (...) a few modifications help a lot. whoever designed the legs on this thing must have been trying to make it hard to stand. (...) I think it looks pretty good, for the most part. (...) well, the primary colors are not very visible, thanks to the (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: 7106, 7126, 7166
|
| (...) I love it. I'm having AT-ST, AT-ST, AT-ST, AT-ST, AT-ST, AT-ST, spam and AT-ST for lunch. If LEGO can't give us the goods in the "way-over priced" range of old, at least they are making a bunch of these "decent as a main model but really good (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: 7106, 7126, 7166
|
| (...) For some reason I had it in my head that the AT-ST was $15, so I was pretty happy when I saw it was only $10. I agree that the parts were great, but I really would have been happier with even a $15 set and just a little more - a better hip (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: 7106, 7126, 7166
|
| (...) I like it, too. It's a cute, fun, set. Everything Lego should be. Not to say I wouldn't want to see a UCS version to minifig scale. Kevin (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | star wars creations in lego
|
| I remember seeing some pictures of a "hanger" once that someone was working on. It has places where b-wings were held in racks and some other really cool details. Does anyone know of this site and/or other sites that have starwars (i don't know what (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: 7106, 7126, 7166
|
| (...) No. I quite like it, and I think it has many merits (both as parts and as a model), but I've decided to stop responding to every post bashing it. eric (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | E-Z Homemade IG-88
|
| For anybody who's interested: You can make a pretty accurate IG-88 assassin droid with some of the 2001 pieces. Here's what you need: - the gray alien torso from one of the Life on Mars sets - two gray arms from that little alien Life on Mars (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: Stormtroopers
|
| Alas, I know you're right. But everytime I glance at my classic spacemen, I can't help but think how very cool a rainbow of STs would be. I suppose an AT-AT driver would have the TIE pilot torso printing on white, with a red imperial insignia on his (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
| | | | | Re: 7106, 7126, 7166
|
| Am I the only one here who LIKES the AT-ST? I mean it's not perfect, but for $10 it's a great set (and if it were much more, even as a better set, I probably wouldn't have bought it). I'm noticing less and less that TLC produces that I like, and so (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
|
