 | | Re: Atmospheric Mecha Carrier Update!
|
|
(...) I've never seen Gasaraki. I've only seen a few pictures of the mecha used in that show. However, my mecha isn't based on the Gasaraki designs. (...) Thank you Jeff! I know that the exposed pilots are at risk of being killed, but just imagine (...) (23 years ago, 25-Feb-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: Atmospheric Mecha Carrier Update!
|
|
(...) Heh. How realistic of you. Remember, your weapon was built by the lowest bidder! Be all we tell you to be! ;^) ~Grand Admiral Muffin Head (23 years ago, 25-Feb-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: Atmospheric Mecha Carrier Update!
|
|
(...) Actually, I wasn't refering to the mecha; rather I was refering to the method of deployment. :) In Gasaraki, small mecha parachuted out of a low flying Cargo Plane. Cool idea, just seems like there would be too much potential for harm to the (...) (23 years ago, 25-Feb-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: Atmospheric Mecha Carrier Update!
|
|
(...) Oh sorry. Actually this idea was also you in other anime shows, such as Patlabor, and even games, such as Gun Griffon Blaze. (...) like (...) Actually, the pilots of these mecha would require tremendous skill and experience to properly operate (...) (23 years ago, 25-Feb-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: Atmospheric Mecha Carrier Update!
|
|
"Mladen Pejic" <milovan@netcom.ca> wrote in message news:G9Bq0n.GAB@lugnet.com... (...) thing (...) the (...) that (...) make (...) Amen!!! "Wow, it's _meant_ to be ugly, so it's not, right?...." Nope. It's still ugly. It reminds me of an old (...) (23 years ago, 25-Feb-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: Atmospheric Mecha Carrier Update!
|
|
"Mark Sandlin" <sandlin@nwlink.com> wrote in message news:B6BE8C53.DD02%s...ink.com... (...) This saying drives me up the wall. I mean, surely it's cheaper to use lead than depleted uranium? Or to build a jet without ejector seats? My point is that (...) (23 years ago, 25-Feb-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: Atmospheric Mecha Carrier Update!
|
|
Thanks for the support Paul. And thanks for the cool Chinese proverb... ;-) (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: Atmospheric Mecha Carrier Update!
|
|
(...) power of depleted uranium shells :) That's the only thing I can think of... And if they don't include ejection seats, someone will get upset (depends on who finds out). What was the point of your reply exactly? (23 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: Atmospheric Mecha Carrier Update!
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) <snip> I think your statement is the source of your issue. The phrase isn't meant to justify a less interesting design. (Besides, why would I be trying to justify something Mladen built when I don't know his reasons?) It's a (...) (23 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
