Subject:
|
Re: NASA IS GOING BACK BABY
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Mon, 5 Feb 2007 12:21:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5261 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Brian Davis wrote:
| |
Same reason we see Antarctica being populated and developed largely by
commerical interests... except wait a minute, that’s right, it’s not :-).
|
Just wait till we need the water...
Sorry to intrude spacers ; )
God Bless,
Nathan
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: NASA IS GOING BACK BABY
|
| (...) Actually, exactly the point I was trying to make (you just made it shorter). If there's an economic or resource-driven reason for doing something, commercial interests do a great job. But if you want to go somewhere, trying to invent (...) (17 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: NASA IS GOING BACK BABY
|
| First off, (having missed the start of this thread), I really wasn't all that shook up by the announcment for the simple reason that the announcement doesn't mean anything. Any more than it did with the previous "we're going to Mars" pushes. (...) (...) (17 years ago, 4-Feb-07, to lugnet.space)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
