Subject:
|
Re: A little classic space trivia
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Thu, 21 Sep 2000 17:42:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
416 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, David Eaton writes:
> Just reflecting on pieces that have changed throughout the years...
>
> What classic space set is no longer functional when made out of all newer • (post
> 1990) pieces
My answer below:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
6805 Astro Dasher
Did I get it? Do I get one as a prize? ;-)
Regards,
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: A little classic space trivia
|
| (...) Not quite! Although that does fit Hint #6 better than I anticipated! The set in question has functionality that is actually made impossible by the newer version of a particular piece! As near as I can tell, the set you suggested is still (...) (24 years ago, 21-Sep-00, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | A little classic space trivia
|
| Just reflecting on pieces that have changed throughout the years... What classic space set is no longer functional when made out of all newer (post 1990) pieces? Hints below... (to people that may know more about this than I-- are there any others?) (...) (24 years ago, 21-Sep-00, to lugnet.space)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
