Subject:
|
Re: Spaceworld v. 1.0
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Tue, 25 Jul 2000 19:37:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2383 times
|
| |
|
|
> From: "richard marchetti" <blueofnoon@aol.com>
>
> 3. Given my first point, I would have preferred the reflection of a starfield
> in the chrome, or just a simple chrome look without reflection. What you have
> now presumes reflections from other sources -- like a desert covered planet,
> and a blue sky? Blue/brown chrome reflection only works (or makes sense) if
> you have these two other elements in your design as well. If you look at the
> Star Wars packaging, as an example, they have just hinted at a golden surface
> without reflections of any particular sort.
http://collectibles.echostation.com/toyguide/starwars/vader/vaderfront.jpg
~M
--
Mark's Lego Creations
http://www.nwlink.com/~sandlin/lego
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Spaceworld v. 1.0
|
| (...) other SW packaging...NOT! If you think that the blue and brown are reflections of anything but sky and ground from a planet surface -- well, you're just not facing the facts of how this air-brushed chrome look came about. Trust me on this. I (...) (26 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Spaceworld v. 1.0
|
| (...) looks great! But here are my point of contention: 1. Rather than a blue field, I would have preferred a starfield of some kind. If it must a blue field, go much darker with it -- towards indigo. 2. There are ripples of some sort in both the (...) (26 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.space)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
