Subject:
|
Re: The U. S. S. Roderik has been launched!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space, lugnet.build
|
Date:
|
Tue, 22 Jul 2003 04:39:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
576 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Trevor Pruden wrote:
| |
In lugnet.space, Mark Sandlin wrote:
| |
In lugnet.space, Nathan Wells wrote:
|
|
(buzzcut)
| |
| |
The landing legs look really wimpy on a ship of this size. I suggest
doubling them up so they’re at least 2-wide... and put some nice big feet on
them.
|
The landing gear should be A LOT bigger given the presumed mass of the ship.
But I agree that they should pull into the fuselage. If this is a landing
craft, thent here should be banks of landing thrusters as well for a full
VTOL effect.
|
One could keep the wimpy-looking landing gear and instead devise a Higgs Boson
Field Negator, which would cut the percieved mass of the ship tremendously. As
a bonus, it could also allow you to travel at or near c with realistic fuel
expenditures.
Just a thought...
Mike
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: The U. S. S. Roderik has been launched!
|
| (...) I tend to agree...I've really grown to like larger engine areas...and after seeing Dan Jassim's Dragonstar I am pretty much convinced that it can be done properly. For smaller ships, I think Dan's star shuttle is another good example of cases (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jul-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build, FTX)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
