 | | Re: Space Stations... (and Space Relations) —Tom McDonald
|
| | | (...) I remember it well. The thing that I remember most about why it died was the fact that we basically couldn't agree on what sort of technology could be used. For example, some folks don't use forcefields or FTL propulsion. I believe even a (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jun-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Space Stations... (and Space Relations) —Mark Nelson
|
| | | | (...) Well, I'm thinking that it is just in orbit around a planet, so it doesn't need propulsion, and that it does have gravity. And how far in the future? Why does it matter? :) As I said, this is Lego, it doesn't have to be realistic! :) Also, why (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jun-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Space Stations... (and Space Relations) —George Haberberger
|
| | | | | (...) I'm working on several kinds of space craft, and I like having the constraints of technology, it forces me to make me craft more realistic, at least for me. For my near future craft, they use chemical propulsion, so I have to include rocket (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jun-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Space Stations... (and Space Relations) —Mark Nelson
|
| | | | | | (...) Yes. Actualy, the LegoWars has a strict rule. You may not use technology unless it might be created at this time, so thats what I do. :) In short, I pretty much agree with you. (...) Oh yes, quite nice stuff. My newest ship, the Peryodention, (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jun-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Space Stations... (and Space Relations) —Tom McDonald
|
| | | | (...) In the smallest of ways the year could matter, but it shouldn't stand in the way of building. Personally I think it's a very small issue and I pretty much don't care. It's something that could be discussed later. And probly the only reason it (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jun-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Space Stations... (and Space Relations) —Stephen F. Roberts
|
| | | | (...) ...When I write stuff, I try not to even mention Earth, and never mention a date or even locations in earth relative terms (usually something like CY 79 for Colony Year 79). This has a couple handy effects: 1 - I'm never wrong! don't you love (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jun-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Space Stations... (and Space Relations) —Tom McDonald
|
| | | | (...) date or even (...) Year 79). This (...) Star Trek shows (...) Yeah.. where is Khan anyway? :-) (...) discovered (...) they were (...) the future so (...) I like your idea, so maybe we'll share some mileage. You've expressed yourself quite (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jun-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Space Stations... (and Space Relations) —Randy Williams
|
| | | | | I vote to make the sleeping quarters/ mess hall! we also need a standard uniform. (24 years ago, 16-Jun-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Space Stations... (and Space Relations) —Mark Nelson
|
| | | | | | (...) Like turn two things into one? (...) Well, in me own little head, I was thinking guys wearing almost all black in the control center, called the, "Administration Memebers" and everywhere else, green unitron suits. :) -- Mark Nelson Speedy's (...) (24 years ago, 17-Jun-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Space Stations... (and Space Relations) —Stephen F. Roberts
|
| | | | (...) ...The calendar could also refer to some unnamed 'external source'. 0500CT (calendar time) for example. ...It could be fun if local station time does not always mesh up with 'time' IE. 'midnite' would occasionally fall in the middle of what (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jun-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
