Subject:
|
Re: About FTX pictures and Sig images.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Mon, 9 Jun 2003 18:46:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
452 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Mike Petrucelli wrote:
| |
In lugnet.space, Gil Shaw wrote:
| |
In lugnet.space, Tim Courtney wrote:
| |
Gil -
I like your sig a lot, but it could be about half the size.
-Tim (I wish there was a Windows Paint filter on LUGNET) :P
|
Thanks Tim...I think you’re right about size. Let’s try this:
Cheers,
-G
|
To Gil, Mark, and Nathan; I think the sig pics you guys just used are good. I
hope people use your sig pics as a guide for the largest some one should make
a banner style sig pic. As far as the icon style sig pics, I think the Grand
Admiral and myself have good examples to not exceed in terms of size. Any
other opinions on the size issue?
-Mike Petrucelli
|
snip... (good sized sig pic BTW)
Most of the time it’s not the size, but how you use it. :-)
While I have plenty of bandwidth at work, I’m still on a dial-up at home. I’m
all for snipping out other people’s sig when replying. One, it saves on
bandwith. Two, if I want to see your sig I’ll surf up the thread. Three, after a
few replies there will tend to be more sigs and less content. And that’s why I’m
here - for the content.
-Duane
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: About FTX pictures and Sig images.
|
| (...) To Gil, Mark, and Nathan; I think the sig pics you guys just used are good. I hope people use your sig pics as a guide for the largest some one should make a banner style sig pic. As far as the icon style sig pics, I think the Grand Admiral (...) (21 years ago, 9-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
