Subject:
|
Re: Space legends, my thoughts...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space, lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Mon, 23 Dec 2002 20:53:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2114 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, William R. Ward writes:
>
> But I really don't see what's so bad about the helmets. Put a new
> style helmet on a Classic Space (not Futuron) fig, and put him in a
> Galaxy Explorer - I am pretty sure that unless you look really closely
> you wouldn't even notice the difference.
Although I would be willing to accept Classic reruns with newer helmet
styles, I seem to recall trying this years ago and discovering that with
certain smaller-cockpit designs, a visored helmet would actually interfere
with the closing of the cockpit (because the face of the visor sticks out
just enough to touch a canopy in models where the pilot sits forward). I
don't have any examples in my head of which models this could be a problem
with, but I do recall experiencing it. ...Of course, as I have said, if
they produced classic space sets as Legends, I would probably be looking at
them for their pieces and wouldn't use the original design anyway. So it's
all good to me. :)
-Hendo
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Space legends, my thoughts...
|
| (...) Classic Space is great in general, but there are exceptions. Nothing you could put in a Walking Astro Grappler would make it *not* look crap. That's probably the lamest set LEGO ever made, not counting the Time Twisters line I suppose. But I (...) (22 years ago, 21-Dec-02, to lugnet.space, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
