Subject:
|
Re: Where does the Life on Mars theme fit in to the LEGO universe?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Mon, 16 Sep 2002 06:11:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
529 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Jesse Alan Long writes:
> This may sound like a weird question but, if Life on Mars is indeed a LEGO
> Space theme, why is it not any place in LEGO Space? Even a link would be
> nice, such as one to Star Wars. If Life on Mars does not fit into LEGO
> space, where does it fit into in the LEGO universe? Is it a branch off of
> Space Port? I seriously doubt it, though the technology looks remarkably
> similar to technology of that time in the LEGO Earth history. My guess is
> that the Life on Mars theme predates even Classic Space (in the LEGO Space
> time line, not in real life) so I guess that Life on Mars is the first, at
> least in LEGO Space terms, space series.
LOM is indeed an offshoot of Spaceport. Where did you think the Spaceport
shuttles ended up? :)
Seriously, though I liked LOM and would love to see it continued, I can
understand the ending of individual product lines. My one gripe is the lack of
an adequate replacement for LOM. Sorry, but Galidor just won't suffice.
> Where does Alpha Team also fit into the LEGO universe?
Like Rock Raiders, Alpha Team is an entity unto itself. As cool as it is, it's
neither town, nor space, but a hybrid of both with some super spy stuff thrown
in.
> Galidor also deserves mention as do lesser liked sets.
No it doesn't, but I digress.
> We are preserving
> the continuity of LEGO here, people, not being biased idiots favoring one
> set over another. Sure, some sets and product lines are horrible but we
> must do LEGO a service and show them all. LEGO looks to this web site as
> their chief source of information. We are also their future, whether we
> like it or not in life.
Wow! As much as I love Lugnet, I don't see how this site is Lego's future. We
provide some cool ideas, and help them eveluate their product lines with regards
to TFOL and AFOL customers, but to think LUGNET is their 'chief source of
information' is probably overstating things a bit.
> While we are on this subject, I thought that I would mention that we need
> to revamp the whole way that LUGNET is set up. I hate having to resort to
> looking through a Top View or Tree View map for a particular theme that is
> mixed up with a whole other bunch of little branches such as CAD drawing and
> off-topic subjects. I mean, it works nice for an index but I think that we
> need to be less biased and more truthful in here. We need to include more
> themes on the main page in order to keep traffic more freely flowing on here.
If it ain't broke.....
> There are many things that the average person, such as myself, does not
> understand in LUGNET, such as the hatred of Timmy or of Town Jr. Why has no
> one raised a whimper about LEGO Creator or the elimination of LEGO Duplo or
> LEGO Primo? LEGO Duplo was the second biggest market in LEGO next to the
> other sets, yet no one seems to care about any of those things on here. Why
> have arguments over the silliest, most corny thoughts that a person could
> think just to get some twisted, psychotic hatred out towards a little chunk
> of ABS plastic? Come on, people, there are bigger fish to fry out in the
> world. Grow up and move on or be immature and be left behind.
Try looking around a bit and you'll see a 2002 Duplo and Primo line-it just
doesn't use that name anymore. I like to think of it as re-naming a car just
beacuse it's released by a different part of the company. Perhaps Lego considers
the Duplo name to be 'long in the tooth'. Just because the name isn't on the
boxes anymore doesn't mean the parts aren't inside....
Regarding Timmy and Town Jr.-Timmy was always a silly minifig to base a theme
around, but I'll take Timmy over Jar Jar Binks anyday! Town Jr-some people
considered it to be the dumbing down of Town, but there's still parts in those
sets that Town can't touch (bay windows comes to mind), so I'll agree with you
there. Leave Town Jr. alone already....
> <snip> A really brilliant person could then cause a
> boycott and hurt the business of LEGO while at the same time own a lot of
> stock in LEGO. Of course, we could simply ask LEGO to be nice and allow the
> classic themes to return but in the end, our voice counts.
>
> Jesse Long
Uh, so all wa have to do is get MegaBlocks to buy up Lego stock.....
Sorry, I think this is a BAD idea. Lego is doing just fine without becoming a
smaller part of a larger conglomerate (think Hasbro).
-Dave
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
12 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
