Subject:
|
Re: Moonbase & 32x32 landing pads
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 20:57:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
280 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Adrian Drake writes:
> Interesting concept. However, the original plan for large scale moonbase
> displays (such as that for next year's Brickfest) was to have a separate
> landing/runway area, which would be based on the 32x32 footprint of the
> landing pad and T junction road plates.
But you could easily conceive of the moonbase as having been built up over
the years, one module at a time, as the population expanded. As such, you
wouldn't expect the layout to be perfectly planned. Of course, this
conception fits the variety of building styles you get with multiple builders.
Bruce
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Moonbase & 32x32 landing pads
|
| (...) Interesting concept. However, the original plan for large scale moonbase displays (such as that for next year's Brickfest) was to have a separate landing/runway area, which would be based on the 32x32 footprint of the landing pad and T (...) (22 years ago, 14-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
