Subject:
|
Re: Moonbase & 32x32 landing pads
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 19:43:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
411 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Greg Howell writes:
>
>
> Submitted for your approval:
Well, I approve. I like the concept.
>
> My first section of Moonbase incorperates the 32x323 landing pad. The concept
> is for a small pad for cargo and light ship landing in the midst of a large
> base.
>
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=23197
>
> With a "Cargo Hopper" on the pad:
>
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=225121
>
> I am planning to expand my little area with warehouses and other related
> facilities.
> I'm also working on a fully elevated landing pad.
In my opinion fully elevated pads are the way to go. Guiding a craft between
all of those modules to the platform could get a little hairy if the
Instrument Landing System goes down. ;-)
-Duane
http://www.geocities.com/dnjhess/lego.html
>
> Greg
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Moonbase & 32x32 landing pads
|
| (...) Submitted for your approval: My first section of Moonbase incorperates the 32x323 landing pad. The concept is for a small pad for cargo and light ship landing in the midst of a large base. (URL) a "Cargo Hopper" on the pad: (URL) am planning (...) (22 years ago, 14-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
