Subject:
|
Re: 32x32 moonbase modules
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Fri, 2 Aug 2002 19:42:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
655 times
|
| |
|
|
"William R Ward" <bill@wards.net> wrote in message
news:m2ado5uky2.fsf@komodo.home.wards.net...
>
> However, I still have all my space crater & landing plates from my
> childhood. Any contribution I make to this effort (and I would like
> to make one) would have to be using those plates, at least for now.
How about using a 32 by 32 baseplate padded with 16x16 or 32x16 base plates
on two sides. (or even 8x16)
There might be "gaps" in the base of the overall 48x48 shape, but it would
allow the connecting corridors to reach to the edges of the 48x48 format.
-David
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 32x32 moonbase modules
|
| (...) Sure, if you don't mind green :-) (...) My point is that any 32x32 modules would only be allowable on the periphery of the moonbase, since they could not be connected on two of the sides. However, if they're built properly they can still (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 32x32 moonbase modules
|
| (...) And 5) I don't have any of them, and I'm not the only one. Also, they're difficult to store. My wife and I (no kids, thankfully) live in a 600 sq. ft. 2BR house (yes, I've even measured it), and have a very limited budget for LEGO. However, I (...) (22 years ago, 2-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
