Subject:
|
Re: 32x32 moonbase modules
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Mon, 5 Aug 2002 19:49:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1126 times
|
| |
|
|
"David Carriker" <dcarriker@wbgppm.com> writes:
> "William R Ward" <bill@wards.net> wrote in message
> news:m2ado5uky2.fsf@komodo.home.wards.net...
> >
> > However, I still have all my space crater & landing plates from my
> > childhood. Any contribution I make to this effort (and I would like
> > to make one) would have to be using those plates, at least for now.
>
>
> How about using a 32 by 32 baseplate padded with 16x16 or 32x16 base plates
> on two sides. (or even 8x16)
Sure, if you don't mind green :-)
> There might be "gaps" in the base of the overall 48x48 shape, but it would
> allow the connecting corridors to reach to the edges of the 48x48 format.
My point is that any 32x32 modules would only be allowable on the
periphery of the moonbase, since they could not be connected on two of
the sides. However, if they're built properly they can still connect
on the other two sides.
For example:
###
###%%
###%%
######
######
######
Here, ### represents a 48x48 baseplate and %% a 32x32 one.
--Bill.
--
William R Ward bill@wards.net http://www.wards.net/~bill/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Verbing weirds language. --Calvin
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: 32x32 moonbase modules
|
| "William R Ward" <bill@wards.net> wrote in message news:m2ado5uky2.fsf@...rds.net... (...) How about using a 32 by 32 baseplate padded with 16x16 or 32x16 base plates on two sides. (or even 8x16) There might be "gaps" in the base of the overall (...) (22 years ago, 2-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
