Subject:
|
Re: 32x32 moonbase modules
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Sat, 3 Aug 2002 18:30:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
697 times
|
| |
|
|
as one of the very sleepy brains involved
in the 'std roundtable' at bfest, i can
assure you we discussed many many permutations,
and the issue w/ the 48's is NOT to crimp your
style or tell you what to build (and as has
been said, there IS an intent to become more
flexible once we DO this a few times)
as mark points out, the 'std' is about how to
integrate everything into a DISPLAY. If you
want to match up, follow the std, or cut a deal
w/ your LUG so you can get yours into the display.
:-)
-paul
In lugnet.space, Mark Sandlin writes:
> In lugnet.space, William R. Ward writes:
>
> > Also, they're difficult to store. My wife and I (no kids, thankfully)
> > live in a 600 sq. ft. 2BR house (yes, I've even measured it), and have
> > a very limited budget for LEGO.
> >
> > However, I still have all my space crater & landing plates from my
> > childhood. Any contribution I make to this effort (and I would like
> > to make one) would have to be using those plates, at least for now.
>
> Tell you what... if you're planning to attend NWBrickCon, you bring a base
> that will fit on a 48x48 and we'll have a spare plate to loan you so you can
> integrate into the display.
>
> Mmkay? :^)
>
> ~GAMH
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: 32x32 moonbase modules
|
| (...) Tell you what... if you're planning to attend NWBrickCon, you bring a base that will fit on a 48x48 and we'll have a spare plate to loan you so you can integrate into the display. Mmkay? :^) ~GAMH (22 years ago, 2-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
