 | | 32x32 moonbase modules —William R. Ward
|
| | | This is a great idea. But let's make a clear definition of what a 32x32 module should be. Some people may not have the resources to build 9 of them. So how about this: If you build a 32x32 module, it should be designed to line up with 48x48 modules (...) (22 years ago, 1-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: 32x32 moonbase modules —Chris Giddens
|
| | | | (...) Let's try not to muddy the waters too soon. The standard of 48x48 was set because 1) the big ol' baseplate is still generally available 2) it allows lots of building space 3) it's grey, and 4)it's easier to begin figuring out how all this will (...) (22 years ago, 2-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 32x32 moonbase modules —William R. Ward
|
| | | | | (...) And 5) I don't have any of them, and I'm not the only one. Also, they're difficult to store. My wife and I (no kids, thankfully) live in a 600 sq. ft. 2BR house (yes, I've even measured it), and have a very limited budget for LEGO. However, I (...) (22 years ago, 2-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 32x32 moonbase modules —David Carriker
|
| | | | | | | "William R Ward" <bill@wards.net> wrote in message news:m2ado5uky2.fsf@...rds.net... (...) How about using a 32 by 32 baseplate padded with 16x16 or 32x16 base plates on two sides. (or even 8x16) There might be "gaps" in the base of the overall (...) (22 years ago, 2-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: 32x32 moonbase modules —William R. Ward
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Sure, if you don't mind green :-) (...) My point is that any 32x32 modules would only be allowable on the periphery of the moonbase, since they could not be connected on two of the sides. However, if they're built properly they can still (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 32x32 moonbase modules —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | | | (...) Tell you what... if you're planning to attend NWBrickCon, you bring a base that will fit on a 48x48 and we'll have a spare plate to loan you so you can integrate into the display. Mmkay? :^) ~GAMH (22 years ago, 2-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 32x32 moonbase modules —Paul Hartzog
|
| | | | | | as one of the very sleepy brains involved in the 'std roundtable' at bfest, i can assure you we discussed many many permutations, and the issue w/ the 48's is NOT to crimp your style or tell you what to build (and as has been said, there IS an (...) (22 years ago, 3-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 32x32 moonbase modules —Anthony Babington
|
| | | | pardon me for poking in here, but I had another thought. if you have the parts for it, you can build a 48x48 module on a 32x32 plate... you'll end up with a lot of the module hanging off the edge, but it'll work, especially if you design it to (...) (22 years ago, 3-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
