Subject:
|
Re: Bricks = Blocky? Nah... (Was Three Galactic Alliance Carriers)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Sun, 25 Nov 2001 05:00:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
508 times
|
| |
|
|
With you on that!
I like to think that my work with the Carriers has left them a bit less boxy
than... well... *boxes*. They lack the curves of a ship like Myase, but I
try to keep them slim and trim all the same. Curving the front and back ends
help imensely when trying to do that, I find, so even without slopes, boxes
aren't required. Well, I tend to like building them as construction bases
for their stability, but other than that...
I've tried my hand at SNOT before, with... how do I say this... they
COLLAPSED :P ! *sigh* I suppose I'm too much a traditionalist!
Can't think outside the box ;)
All groan now.
Kenneth Tam
GA 826 Squadron
http://www.members.home.com/ga826squadron/Main.html
In lugnet.space, Kyle Keppler writes:
> In lugnet.space, Steve Runnels writes:
> > I've started working on a capship, or 2 ;), and I don't have anywhere near
> > as many slopes and plates as a lot of ppl here. And I only have 3 blue tubs,
> > yet what I'm working on will be FAR from boxy and consist mainly of bricks. :P
> >
> > I guess I'll just have to show you what I mean once I have some pics.
> >
> > I try my damnest to not let my lack of pieces hinder my creativity, in fact,
> > I find it actually SPAWNS creativity. :D
>
> Werd. You can definatly make something not look boxy without using a ton of
> slopes. It's called SNOT ;-P. I have found that large plates work well for
> large ships. They make it lighter too!
>
> <plug> Check out my ship: http://myase.hvl.cjb.net </plug>
>
> --Kyle
> http://hvl.cjb.net (who only has 2 blue tubs, and one is still almost full!)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
11 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
