Subject:
|
Re: Galaxy Enforcer Contest Winners
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Tue, 24 Jul 2001 05:17:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
439 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Matthew Gerber writes:
>
> <snip>
Dear Mr. Gerber,
I have consulted on behalf of the Galaxy Enforcer Contests
Super Interstellar Conglomerate Company Corporation AG LL.C.
Unltd with my own counsel, the eerily bright Mr. Harvey Richards,
Lawyer for Children [1], and his unimpeachable legal mind
asserts that by the doctrine of Unassailable Self-Incrimination,
known to the layman as "He who smelt it, dealt it", you stink.
And, of course, in order to win in the Best Chicken category,
it is helpful if your entry *is in fact a chicken*. Merely
being "fowl" or "foul" does not count in this matter. This
advice is a bonus and will not be charged by Mr. Richards's hourly
rate of $4,500 and (three rare and prized pineapple Dum-Dums)
an hour.
nyah,
LFB
[1] The creation of Ruben Bolling of "Tom the Dancing Bug" fame:
http://www.tomthedancingbug.com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Galaxy Enforcer Contest Winners
|
| (...) ___...___*****CONFIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM*****___...___ To: L. F. Braun From: M. A. Gerber Re: Galaxy Enforcer Contest Winners Lindsay, In regard to your recent message, I believe you are missing a prime opportunity. In my estimation, you also (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Galaxy Enforcer Contest Winners
|
| (...) Dear Mr. Paulson, I must protest your choice of winning entries for the "Galaxy Enforcer Contest". While the other entries in the contest were, without a doubt, completely adequate in their own way, you seem to have missed the LUGNET post (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jul-01, to lugnet.space)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
