 | | Re: global output control —Juergen Stuber
|
| | | (...) How about DontInvertOutput? Not beautiful, but IMHO clearer. Jürgen (25 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: global output control —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | (...) What's wrong with Obvert? (25 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: global output control —Juergen Stuber
|
| | | | | | (...) I never heard that word before. Jürgen (25 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: global output control —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | | (...) It's a bit obscure, but a perfectly good word -- the opposite of invert. It means to turn something forward, as opposed to invert, which is to turn something backward. (25 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | RE: global output control —Ralph Hempel
|
| | | | (...) Ummm, how about... ReverseOutput(const int outs); // global reverse ForwardOutput(const int outs); // global fwd Reverse kind of implies invert, but I don't think that will matter to many folks... Cheers, Ralph Hempel - P.Eng ---...--- Check (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: global output control —Dave Baum
|
| | | | (...) The problem I have with ForwardOutput() and ReverseOutput() is that the terms 'forward' and 'reverse' already have a meaning - specifically they refer to motor directions... Fwd(OUT_A); Rev(OUT_B); If you then 'reverse' the global direction... (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: global output control —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | (...) I thought about this for a while, when I was thinking about "obvert". In one sense, "invert" does imply that inversing again will revert (*grin*), but I don't believe that this meaning is implicit. There is another sense which simply means "to (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| | | | |
