| |
Kingsley Gifford <kgifford@thezone.net> wrote:
> As for the script, all I get is Building h8x tools from
> /lego-ms/binutils-20011002-1 and gcc-2.95.3-5 which according to the
> script, seems to be what would happen anyway because of the "exit 4":
Ooops. Forgot to remove that before I sent it to you. Delete that line.
> does any of this make sense?
Well, I wrote the script, so I guess it makes sense to me.
> I'm assuming that even if I did get the patch working I would be no
> better off since make ALL_TARGET_MODULES="" doesn't work.
True... BUT:
You are using the cygwin versions of binutils and gcc. I don't know why, and
don't have the skills to analyse in detail, but I couldn't build those either. I
used unmodified GNU releases, binutils-2.12 and gcc-2.95.3 (no -5 suffix). Those
built and worked fine for me.
Max.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Makefile patch
|
| Well, after a fairly frustrating couple of days, I was finally able to build legOS-0.2.5 yesterday evening. I will get to the details in a minute. The whole experience made me question the stability of Cygwin/GCC. Basically, I tried at least 3 (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | RE: Makefile patch
|
| I can get binutils done, but in gcc make ALL_TARGET_MODULES="" and make INSTALL_TARGET_MODULES="" install do not work...they come up with errors. I'm using the most recent version of cygwin. As for the script, all I get is Building h8x tools from (...) (22 years ago, 17-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
