 | | Re: Motor Speed Fix
|
|
(...) I've been busy. I have also added a patch for control of arbitrary motors. (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Motor Speed Fix
|
|
Oops! The URL is (URL) have also added a patch to fix cputw(). (...) (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Motor Speed Fix
|
|
I have a patch on my legOS page which fixes a problem with motor speed control in legOS-0.1.7. -- No honest business is promoted by spam with the possible exception of Hormel. (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | I found out why I couldn't compile demo/first-c++
|
|
Make clean doesn't remove object files in lib/mint, lib/c++, or lib/c, and legOS is shipped with compiled objects in there. Markus' environment is somehow different from mine, and sensor.o was looking for a symbol (something to do with getting a (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Uploading *.prg To RCX
|
|
Is there a program that allows you to download the prg files created from the Lego CD-ROM to the RCX without loading the Lego CD program? Help Appreciated! Adamski _______ <adamski2000@adamski...rve.co.uk> (26 years ago, 28-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | legOS Network Protocol
|
|
Markus, I have been away for the last week or so. What have I missed in the discussion on LNP? I would like to get cracking on this. I have 2 or 3 guys over here who want to get into this too. -Jake Jacob S. Barrett jsbarrett@acm.org (26 years ago, 28-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: gcc build instructions for linux
|
|
(...) week ago. (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | gcc build instructions for linux
|
|
Linux Tools for Hitachi H8/300 Microprocessor Development (URL) came across this site today. It has good instructions for building the gcc h3000 compiler on Linux. I thought people here might also be interested in the crt0.s 'C' startup source. I (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: names
|
|
(...) Will you resist the temptation 2nd time around it TLGs lawyers decide that the 'LegOS' name is a possible infringement? :) Richard(OS) (26 years ago, 25-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | names
|
|
Hello, some friends asked me today why I did resist the temptation of putting my name in the OS name. (It just never occurred to me.) However, there was somebody around who speaks Polish. He pointed out that Noga is Polish for leg. Totally caught me (...) (26 years ago, 25-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Compiler
|
|
Hi Lou, new binaries would be nice. I did create an archive, but I didn't feel like pumping those Megabytes over my modem yet. Mine is about 3.3MB, though - did your install script really strip all those executables? Markus. (26 years ago, 25-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: toolchain
|
|
On the subject of licences: I always forget the details, coz they bore me, but as a result of working on Apache, I do know a few things: 1. There is an LGPL that is less restrictive than GPL. 2. GPL licences are not compatible with all other (...) (26 years ago, 24-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: toolchain
|
|
(...) I am by no means an license expert, but I just happen to have been reading about the GPL, and the MPL is pretty similar, though there are, of course, differences. The doc that I read stated that you can apply the GPL only to the files that you (...) (26 years ago, 24-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Compiler
|
|
(...) That does appear to have been the problem after all. (...) I eventually managed to build egcs on a different computer and copy it over to mine. Markus -- if you want the binary (bzip2 cpio) of binutils and egcs, I could point you at it for (...) (26 years ago, 24-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: toolchain
|
|
(...) Read the MPL again. It's not clear to me that you need to MPL all your code if you include unmodified source from something that is covered by MPL. But if you include MPL'd source, you certainly have to make it clear what code is covered by (...) (26 years ago, 23-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: toolchain
|
|
(...) Yes, I believe GNU configure is covered by GPL. I already changed legOS licensing to MPL because Kekoa's math routines are MPL. I'm not sure if we may continue to use them if we change yet again. What's the status on menuconfig? Are those (...) (26 years ago, 23-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: toolchain
|
|
(...) What about a simplified gnu 'configure' ? Or would using that scheme mean incorperating the GNU license as well? :) Richard (26 years ago, 23-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Compiler
|
|
I have discovered that the instructions for building the compiler on the legOS site have changed. They now say to build egcs, whereas they used to say to build gcc. This could, conceivably, be why I cannot build good files with 0.1.7, since I'm (...) (26 years ago, 23-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: toolchain
|
|
Menuconfig would be a great thing. Xconfig would be even better, but I agree with Markus' concern about portability. The Linux kernel distributions get around the portability by simply providing all three config tools and letting you use the most (...) (26 years ago, 22-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: How do I convert light sensor data into image bmp?
|
|
(...) Sorry, but I don't understand. Adamski _______ <adamski2000@adamski...rve.co.uk> (26 years ago, 22-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
