 | | Re: DJGPP & LegOS
|
|
Here's some work that was done on May 23, 2002... (URL) Original Message ----- From: "Steve Hassenplug" <hassenplug@mail.com> Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 13:51:33 GMT To: lugnet.robotics.rcx....lugnet.com Subject: Re: DJGPP & LegOS (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: DJGPP & LegOS
|
|
Well, here's a step in the right direction. (URL) I just have to figure out what it means. (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Linux, Cygwin, LegOS
|
|
As I said before: ("LegOS Team"=Unix)=Generalization I think I'm in the same boat as you, Ed. Personally, I really don't want to re-write the kernel (there are other more qualified people working on that) however I'm very interested in making LegOS (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Linux, Cygwin, DJGPP: what is it all about?
|
|
Steve, (...) LegOS? I have been looking into this (in between spending time with my family who is town and sneaking on the computer when my wife is not looking). Basically I don't know yet. If you search this newsgroup there is an individual Rossz (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Re: Scheduler patch
|
|
Joe I think proportional timeslicing would be a nice thing if the implementation would be efficient and straightforward. I don't consider my patch to be that. Would still be nice to see a snippet of your code. How do the other kernel developers feel (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Linux, Cygwin, DJGPP: what is it all about?
|
|
What exactly needs to be done to 'upgrade' DJGPP to work with the new LegOS? Are these same changes required for cygwin? I assume the 'unix' part of this is done by the "LegOS Team", which means it works with Cygwin, but now someone (like Ed) needs (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Linux, Cygwin, DJGPP: what is it all about?
|
|
(...) I don't expect too many people to find it. It has been removed from legOS homepage and I had to dig into some archives for the link. (...) TRUE, VERY TRUE! (...) I think the simple answer to this is "Windows users have two options Cygwin and (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Scheduler patch
|
|
I have found that using proportional timeslicing works great in many situations. It is more forgiving for new developers, since a "runaway" process will not block processes of lower priority. (runaway process used here to mean a process which never (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: *** Remainder: legOS new name poll ***
|
|
How many names have neen suggested? 1? 100? ... (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | *** Remainder: legOS new name poll ***
|
|
Remember that the search for the new name for legOS is en route. The procedure is the following: 1) send your name proposals (10.06. - 22.06.) Please mail me your name ideas. Do this with a personal e-mail to: legOS-namepoll@gmx.de The subject line (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
