 | | Re: Help request : LegOS 2.5, demo/c++.cpp make failure
|
|
(...) Yes, that ist normal. :) With gcc 3.0.3, you get these errors with the c++ demos. I haven't fiddled with it to get rid of those. But the legOS system itself builds fine, even smaller then with the older compiler version. You can do two things: (...) (23 years ago, 23-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Help request : LegOS 2.5, demo/c++.cpp make failure
|
|
I'm trying to install legOS 2.5 for the first time and I'm running into problems. I'm sure it's probably something simple (I hope), but I've been struggling with it for the last two weeks, I've searched on every source I can find, and have simply (...) (23 years ago, 29-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: legOS 0.2.6 - released!
|
|
I wanted to express my thanks to the newly active LegOS development team for a great work releasing 0.2.6. I'm sure your efforts are much appreciated by all LegOS users! Looking forward for future releases! -M- (...) (23 years ago, 22-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: legOS 0.2.6 - released!
|
|
(...) Hey, thanks Stephen, for all your work! Are you gonna do a binary only package for this version, or wait till 0.2.7? And has a name been decided yet for 0.2.7? Thanks again! And I'll be testing Zhengrong's remote control patch next week. (...) (23 years ago, 21-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Makefile patch
|
|
(...) Excellent! (...) OSTYPE=cygwin should no longer be needed with latest legOS. Max. (23 years ago, 20-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | legOS 0.2.6 - released!
|
|
The legOS team has released this interim version of legOS. A hearty thankyou goes to those who helped us test and suggest improvements for this release! We are (after a short rest ;-) moving on to work on our next significant legOS release: Remote (...) (23 years ago, 20-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: Joystick application for LegOS
|
|
You can still switch back and forth between legOS and NQC if you find the joystick control helpful. Another suggestion is to write a legOS program that runs all axis at intervals...if you just need it for testing. A final suggestion is to use the (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: Makefile patch
|
|
I finally have everything working, here's what I did: Installed binutils and gcc with Max Bowsher's script. Extacted the /legOS directory CD to /legOS and 'make OSTYPE=cygwin' Export PATH=$PATH:/legOS/util Export PATH=$PATH:/h8x/bin Export (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Joystick application for LegOS
|
|
Hi all, I've been toying with the idea of switching from NQC to LegOS, but one thing that is keeping me from doing so is that I have not seen a remote control from the PC application similar to that is included with the NQC IDE's on windows. I find (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: CYGWIN & legOS 0.2.5.3
|
|
"Max Bowsher" <maxb@ukf.net> wrote in message news:015701c1e790$f6...ibm.com... (...) folks or (...) on (...) Max, I received errors at various places with various versions (when compiling gcc and once with binutils). Most often, the build would (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: CYGWIN & legOS 0.2.5.3
|
|
Stephen, <snip> (...) Well, the only thing that it is complaining about (that I had to remove) is the use of const void func_decl(...) Really, I want to know what the difference is between: const void foo(void) --- and --- void foo(void) Does the (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: CYGWIN & legOS 0.2.5.3
|
|
(...) What compile errors? Max. (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Makefile patch
|
|
(...) What makes you think it is incomplete. I have used that script to build a working cross-compiler for myself. (...) Well, you will need /h8x/bin in your path. Please post all errors you get using the cross tools you have built (not the (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: CYGWIN & legOS 0.2.5.3
|
|
(...) Am I understanding your diff? This version does not have the "hitachi" segment in the path? (...) And if I'm understanding this, this version of the tool chain does not support 'const'? If this is true, I'm not a fan of removing const from our (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | CYGWIN & legOS 0.2.5.3
|
|
I have verified that the following configuration works (but not without some minor modifications). I am hoping to submit and include the modifications in a future release of legOS (maybe 0.2.7). Apparently, the GNU Toolchain available from the (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Release candidate legos-0.2.5.2 avail for testing
|
|
(...) Well... see... now you boxed me in. ;-) of course you are correct. I was trying to give the benefit of the doubt to our author or to the cygwin developers. I really didn't think the version number should be in the path, but it was there, so I (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: Makefile patch
|
|
Here's the latest on this end: I have some kind of incomplete cross compiler that I build using Max Bowsher's script.... I unpacked the legOS directory did 'make OSTYPE=cygwin' And now I can download helloworld (which is compiled for some reason) (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Final prep. for 0.2.6 release
|
|
(...) I've modified my old patch "LNP checksum optimizations" so it can be applied against version 0.2.5.2, as Stephen asked me to. I've noticed that an older LNP patch -- see (URL) -- has been partly lost. That patch fixed some race conditions in (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Makefile patch
|
|
Kingsley, I did encounter this error, but didn't specifically list the error in my description. You will need to: (...) *** this is the specific fix for "No rule to make target" (...) *** I included the following steps in case you run into these (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: Makefile patch
|
|
I just tried the 2000r1_i686-cygwin32...00-hms.zip and now I get "make: *** No rule to make target I think during my tinkering I'm after deleting some necessary makefile or something, if there's anyone who can pinpoint what I'm missing it would be (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
