 | | Blocking IR
|
|
Before I start trying to do this, does anyone know why the LegOS function write_ir is a blocking function? I'm trying to write an IR detection system but am unable to do so in LegOS because every time I write a byte to the IR port the RCX locks up. (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jun-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: arbitrary motor allocation
|
|
(...) Why does the code need a case statement? What interface are you looking for? void motor_dir(motor, dir) and motor_speed(motor, speed)? I missed the previous discussion. This is easy to implement, with no major changes to the code, just an (...) (25 years ago, 9-Jun-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | arbitrary motor allocation
|
|
If I recall correctly, there was some discussion of a rewrite of the OS's motor code so that arbitrary motors could be assigned by the code without the need for a large case statement in user code. Has that happened? Is it happening? Can I help? (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jun-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: Lego Network Protocol questions
|
|
(...) I'll back you up on this. My pbFORTH sends a simple character stream and it seems to work fine. No complements are necessary. I sure would like to be able to keep the RCX tower alive, though. I wonder if it's the character going through that (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jun-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | tm-and-ir (again)
|
|
Hi all, I've been using Legos without any major problems but never got the tm-and-ir demo to work properly. I can receive characters on the RCX fine but when the 'view' button is pressed (within 3 seconds) the results are normally junk on the screen (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jun-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Network Protocol questions
|
|
(...) So of course I was curious about getting rid of the complements. Apparently, they are not necessary, or so my testing so far seems to indicate. Under the several lighting conditions I tried, and for distances of up to 27' (the farthest I could (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jun-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Network Protocol questions
|
|
(...) I forgot to mention that one possible deficiency is the complements. They can be eliminated, for the most part, with careful counting of zeros. I haven't done any testing regarding this, so I don't know how many zeros in a row will break (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jun-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Network Protocol questions
|
|
Regarding the IR protocol, I have elsewhere suggested the following simple low-level format: 1 start, 1 stop, 2400 baud, odd parity 55 f0 f0 L ~L D1 ~D1 .. Dn ~Dn C ~C L is number of data bytes, valid range 1..255, less depending on buffer sizes Dx (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jun-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: Lego Network Protocol questions
|
|
Sorry, I have been out of the loop for quite some time now on the protocol. Next time will someone smack me when I voluntarily take a compiler theory course on top of 3 other computer sciences courses. I had no life for over a month. I am currently (...) (25 years ago, 5-Jun-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm having problems getting legos to compile
|
|
(...) you can specify where the .h files are using the -I switch... maybe you just need to check the Makefile (or Makefile.common) and change some paths there... or: check the configuration of compiler, sorry, I can't help with that... erik (25 years ago, 5-Jun-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
