|
 | | Ultimate Resume Item
|
| Robot Builder Intern Position Available Firstly, my apologies for posting a job advert in this group. Gentle redirection to a more appropriate newsgroup is welcome. We are a 250-person company with a very successful product which integrates many (...) (25 years ago, 12-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|  
ir
(score: 0.289)
|
|
| | rotation sensors
|
| Hello, one of my beautiful new rotation sensors was jammed right out of the box. I built a robot to try out dynamic equilibrum, i.e., balancing a weighted stick, only to notice that my construction didn't turn at all because of sensor friction. (...) (25 years ago, 17-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
range
(score: 0.289)
|
|
| | Re: legOS-0.2.2
|
| Hi Martin, the FD_ZERO bug sounds interesting. Maybe there's a way to work around this issue in a more portable way? Like, remove /usr/include from the Makefile and hope for the best? The debugging output shows that the host is sending packets and (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
ir
(score: 0.289)
|
|
| | Re: Connecting two RCX's
|
| (...) Another case would be where you also want to use IR for doing radar. If you had IR messages bouncing around for both radar and communication, it might confuse the radar algorithm or generate incorrect readings. (You'd also have to reserve a (...) (25 years ago, 3-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
|
ir
(score: 0.289)
|
|
| | Re: Connecting two RCX's
|
| (...) Actually, the sensors run on 9V too. Why would you not want to use the IR port to get them to cooperate? The "message" system built into them makes this the IDEAL way to communicate, expecially since you won't be tying up a sensor input or a (...) (25 years ago, 3-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
|
ir
(score: 0.288)
|
|
| | Re: Connecting two RCX's
|
| (...) For example if your RCXs are facing opposite direction or if there is a door between them, etc. etc. In such case a wire would be better than IR. Ciao. Marco. (25 years ago, 3-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
|
ir
(score: 0.288)
|
|
| | Connecting two RCX's
|
| Hello, I have two RCX bricks and would like them to co-operate without using the IR-Port. Is it possible to communicate by attaching a motor port of the first RCX to a sensor port of the second? As far as I know the motors work on 9V and the sensors (...) (25 years ago, 3-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
|
ir
(score: 0.288)
|
|
| | Connecting two RCX's
|
| Hello, I have two RCX bricks and would like them to co-operate without using the IR-Port. Is it possible to communicate by attaching a motor port of the first RCX to a sensor port of the second? As far as I know the motors work on 9V and the sensors (...) (25 years ago, 3-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
ir
(score: 0.288)
|
|
| |
|
tower
(score: 0.288)
|
|
| |
|
tower
(score: 0.288)
|
|
| | FW: Window CE Support for the Mindstorm Unit
|
| -----Original Message----- From: Stalker-Wilde, Graham [mailto:graham.stalk...@csfb.com] Sent: Friday, November 19, 1999 2:30 PM To: 'Ralph Hempel' Subject: RE: Window CE Support for the Mindstorm Unit no problem. wait a minute - there is no.... No (...) (25 years ago, 19-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| |
|
tower
(score: 0.288)
|
|
| |
|
tower
(score: 0.288)
|
|
| | Save image word for pbForth.
|
| Hello, Being bored uploading all the optional libraries to my pbForth system all the time, I’ve reinvented the wheel and implemented SAVE-SYSTEM word. Now I can create many different “saved” pbForth versions and load them at will. The idea is (...) (25 years ago, 6-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| |
|
range
(score: 0.287)
|
|
| | Re: IR questinos and more
|
| Hi Sergey, (...) if you intend only to transmit, you may just disable receiving altogether. (...) for an axle. yes, angle=rotation. (...) using the rotation sensor. otherwise, slippage may occur. night, markus. (25 years ago, 27-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
ir
(score: 0.287)
|
|
| | RELEASE: LegoSim -- another LegOS Simulator
|
| RELEASE: LegoSim A UNIX-based Simulator for LegOS with an Applet-GUI LegoSim is (yet another) simulator for LegOS. URL: (URL) another simulator? At the time the project started, there was no other simulator. Once Emulegos was announced, we did not (...) (25 years ago, 29-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
ir
(score: 0.287)
|
|
| | Re: Dead RCX
|
| Completely dead? no response of any kind when you push the ON/OFF button? I ask because if battery power is off for too long, the firmware evaporates and the RCX is pretty non -responsive. But the LCD is not blank. If this is the case, download the (...) (23 years ago, 17-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
long
(score: 0.287)
|
|
| | FW: belated question from Mindfest
|
| -----Original Message----- From: Ralph Hempel [mailto:rhempel@bmts.com] Sent: Monday, November 01, 1999 7:58 PM To: munafo@gcctech.com Subject: RE: belated question from Mindfest (...) Nice to meet you too. I'm not sure if anyone really appreciates (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| |
|
range
(score: 0.287)
|
|
| | Re: Double echo
|
| Hi Ralph, (...) Yes, it works. After fighting for a while with Cygwin32 + binutils (it's still present a bug in linker configuration), finally I got the development environment. Your makefile works fine so it was very easy to get pbFORTH compiled. (...) (25 years ago, 26-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| |
|
ir
(score: 0.287)
|
|
| | Re: NQC vs Spirit communication speed
|
| (...) Correct - dynamic timing is turned off when predictive is being used (which is the default). Predictive is relatively new, and I wasn't sure which code you started with (or how you ported/used it), so that's why I explained the dynamic timing. (...) (23 years ago, 11-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
|
long
(score: 0.286)
|
|
| | Re: What should be in the next version of RcxCC
|
| Mark, even though it's "Not Quite RcxCC", are you open to more 'features' in your tutorial "Programming Lego Robots using NQC" ?? (Looking for URL... mmmm..) found at: (URL) is more related to the 'Education' stuff we've been talking about (and will (...) (25 years ago, 29-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
|
range
(score: 0.286)
|
