To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.rcxOpen lugnet.robotics.rcx in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / RCX / 1929
1928  |  1930
Subject: 
Re: frame RCX reply how
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics.rcx
Date: 
Sat, 1 Feb 2003 19:37:50 GMT
Viewed: 
4117 times
  
bricxcc • ...
0 except:
1 for replies x DA CA BA 8A to ops x 25 35 45 75
2 for replies x [ED] CF to ops x 12 30
8 for reply xEA to op x15
25 [x19] for reply x5A to op xA5
188 [xBC] for reply xDF to op x20
variable for replies x 9C 5B to ops x 63 A4

Corrected/ elaborated in [square brackets].  I found my error by comparing
bricxcc to a delightfully inaccurate summary of ~kekoa on replies that I built
some time ago.  Except again, op 63/6B UploadRam I find only in in "LASM Byte
codes.pdf".

Incidentally, in that same .pdf I saw the hint: "maximum of 150 bytes" reply
payload "because of automatic shutdown in the IR tower".

Pat LaVarre



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: frame RCX reply how
 
(...) Ah, thanks. Can we therefore conclude 45.8 ms/byte = 11/2400 s/byte for each byte of a burst? (...) Tell me more? Do we mean to say RCX in the middle of a football field echoes less well? Should I discard the echo, rather than checking it for (...) (21 years ago, 1-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)

16 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR