 | | Re: 1.0 brick not responding
|
|
(...) Tammy, A couple questions... 1) Does the light on the IR tower flash when you're trying to communicate? 2) Did it ever work (did it work before, but stop, or is this the first time you've tried communicating?) 3) What are you trying to (...) (19 years ago, 12-Sep-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | 1.0 brick not responding
|
|
mac powerbook 5300 communicates with the IR tower, but no response from the brick. palm 130 with pbrick, also no response from the brick. The brick powers on and beeps, just no communication with the powerbook or the palm for programming. Since it (...) (19 years ago, 12-Sep-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX to RCX LNP
|
|
(...) So, I finally sat down and figured out how the lnp state machine works in BrickOS. Turns out it was pretty easy to add in a new set of states so it can process a standard OpCode & store the parameters in variables. At this point, I'm not (...) (19 years ago, 8-Sep-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Arrays and functions in NQC
|
|
(...) No. No. From the NQC Guide: The RCX2, Swan, and Spybotics targets support arrays (the other targets do not have suitable support in firmware for arrays). Arrays are declared the same way as ordinary variables, but with the size of the array (...) (19 years ago, 8-Sep-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Arrays and functions in NQC
|
|
Two little questions for the NQC gurus... - Is it possible to use 2-dimentionnal arrays in NQC? - Is it possible (and if yes what is the syntax) to pass an array as an inline function parameter? TIA, Philo (19 years ago, 8-Sep-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: dll 'error deleting program' with briskOS-0.9.0
|
|
(...) I am also encountering this same problem: - I am working with a Linux 2.6 (Fedora Core 3). - The system was downloaded successfully to the RCX 1.0 brick with firmdl3. - But I COULD NOT load ANY program with the dll utility! Each time I got an (...) (19 years ago, 25-Aug-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | An idea concerning the new RC trains and a new RCX
|
|
Hi, all, I know this might just be a shot in the blue sky, but anyway: Lego is most propably working on a new RCX system. At the Legofan site, there is a discussion about things that should be in a new RCX, and someone mentioned Bluetooth as a (...) (19 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: different output power at different ports?
|
|
(...) I've discovered a thread in legofan (URL) that talks about new features of a possible RCX 3.0. Is there more information that can be handed out? - Dave (19 years ago, 22-Aug-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | Re: container in a container error
|
|
(...) Thanks Claude. I look forward to implementing the correction. Tom (19 years ago, 17-Aug-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX to RCX LNP
|
|
Hi. (...) That would be a fun state machine to set up... ;-) (...) It only does so when it receives opcodes between 0xf0 - 0xf7 or a standard firmware message (0x55). Of the first eight, only 0xf0 and 0xf1 currently require further action, with 0xf0 (...) (19 years ago, 17-Aug-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
