 | | Re: a problem ... need some help !
|
|
(...) Although you may not be using BricxCC to compile your leJOS code I think it might be instructive to describe how BricxCC manages to compile leJOS code properly. The way BricxCC works with leJOS is to create a very simple makefile that launches (...) (20 years ago, 6-Feb-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | BrickOS 0.9.0 -- Debian "sarge" works...
|
|
Well, wouldn't you know, on the very next dist-upgrade after I posted that brickOS 0.9.0 was still in "unstable" on Debian, it materialized in "testing". My laziness was undone! Anyways, I compiled the examples in the Debian-packaged demo (...) (20 years ago, 6-Feb-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Robolab Documentation
|
|
After Dick's recommendation and Elizabeth's support, I purchased Engineering With LEGO Bricks and Robolab ((URL) Second Edition for ROBOLAB 2.5.4 is now shipping. I have struggled with this program for several years, Now, while reading the book, the (...) (20 years ago, 5-Feb-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | Re: a problem ... need some help !
|
|
hi,,, thanks, i just defined JAVAC to where my javac is and its working but there is a small problem that i have to put the java file im compiling in lejos\bin because it doesn't work when i set the CLASSPATH ! i also defined JAVA env var to (...) (20 years ago, 5-Feb-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: a problem ... need some help !
|
|
On the off-chance you might be trying to use lejos with BricxCC here are a few instructions that should get things working. It has been a while since I tried to use lejos with a recent java SDK and it turns out that the pre-built minimal lejos (...) (20 years ago, 5-Feb-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Help please !!!
|
|
does documentation not talk about what values should be given to JAVAC env variable (...) (20 years ago, 5-Feb-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.java)
|
| |
| | Re: Help please !!!
|
|
as <J2SDK1...>\bin\javac (...) (20 years ago, 5-Feb-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.java)
|
| |
| | Re: Help please !!!
|
|
ya javac works fine from the command prompt ... so what can i define JAVAC as? (...) (20 years ago, 4-Feb-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.java)
|
| |
| | Re: Help please !!!
|
|
you seem to be having some basic problem.. try defining JAVAC variable and r u able to execute command javac from the command prompt (...) (20 years ago, 4-Feb-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.java)
|
| |
| | Help please !!!
|
|
hi ... im a newbie ... i have a problem with the lejos setup i did all the instructions and when i tried to compile a java file using the lejosc command i got this reply: Unable to execute javac. Return value of exec is -1. Make sure javac is in the (...) (20 years ago, 4-Feb-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.java)
|
| |
| | a problem ... need some help !
|
|
hi everyone, im just starting to work with lego RIS2.0 and Lejos, but i have a problem with the lejos setup i did all the instructions and when i tried to compile a java file using the lejosc command i got this reply: Unable to execute javac. Return (...) (20 years ago, 4-Feb-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickOS 0.9.0 success
|
|
(...) Well, I'm pleased to report that the 2.6.10 (newest current) kernel, with included legousbtower driver, worked well with the tarball of brickOS 0.9.0. I haven't tried the Debian package yet. I noticed that on the Debian package page, the (...) (20 years ago, 3-Feb-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: New TLC Mindstorms survey
|
|
(...) I'm not sure what good it'll do if the survey is that old but i took it anyway. BTW hope that release it soon since i''ll soon (i hope) be getting 2.0. I'd hate to get it and then a few months later see 3.0 in the shelfs. (20 years ago, 31-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX3 - Can extra hardware functionality be added?
|
|
(...) A friend of mine is actually working on this 'pod' concept. i have been playing with a working prototype and i must say that it preforms very well. and it is SO nice to not be limited on the number of sensor inputs. pictures of the prototype (...) (20 years ago, 31-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: New invention instructions
|
|
(...) Wow, that is really helpful. Thanks to all. I also found something interesting (URL) contains many inventions) (URL) also contains many creations) (20 years ago, 31-Jan-05, to lugnet.build, lugnet.people, lugnet.people.newbie, lugnet.people.teens, lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickOS 0.9.0 success
|
|
Andrew, How fun to hear of your 2.4 success with brickos-0.9.0 It is good to hear that this was possible. With respect to your next efforts I have news... (...) Both brickos-0.9.0 and lnpd-0.9.0 are now debian packages. If these are useful in your (...) (20 years ago, 29-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Sending Commands to Spybot from RCX - Question from a Beginner to Comm area.
|
|
(...) First of all, my apologies for not answering you via email. I've been a bit busy at work. I needed to run some tests myself before I could properly respond as well. The 0x9223 from the RCX happens to match the IR sent out by the Spybot (...) (20 years ago, 28-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.spybotics, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | BrickOS 0.9.0 success
|
|
Hello all -- I have a Linux system with a USB Lego IR tower, and have been intermittently poking around on the web (once every few weeks) in hopes of getting a brickOS system to work on it, with varying levels of enthusiasm. I've gotten it to go (...) (20 years ago, 28-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX3 - Can extra hardware functionality be added?
|
|
(...) I have a proposal that would theoretically allow an RCX to use 49 motors and 147 active sensors (or 588 switches!). This has the potential to control an entire Ball Contraption or railway! The idea may be expandable to four times those (...) (20 years ago, 27-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX3 - Can extra hardware functionality be added?
|
|
hi so IMHO don't expect more outputs because of the power 3 motors + 3 sensors + mainboard have to be powered by bateries some time ago i proposed to make connectors smaller (URL) good think is the size of these connectors of course second is that (...) (20 years ago, 26-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
