To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.rcxOpen lugnet.robotics.rcx in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / RCX / *9070 (-20)
  combining LDCC and NQC style automation?
 
OK, so I made a trolley go back and forth using NQC and my RCX. My wife's response to this was, "I that why you wanted a Mindstorms set?" Her tone implied that while whe thought it was cool, she also thought that I had just reached a new level of (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: New NQC API for RCX-Spybot or RCX-RC communication
 
(...) I forgot to include a few #defines: #define SERIAL_PACKET_RC 0 // default #define SERIAL_PACKET_SPYBOT 0 #define SERIAL_COMM_RC 7 // 4800/76KHZ/25% #define SERIAL_COMM_SPYBOT 7 // was SERIAL_COMM_4800 + SERIAL_COMM_76KHZ The RC function, by (...) (20 years ago, 12-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
 
  Re: RCX seems outputs different power levels
 
(...) snip (...) Well first thing I'd do is try it without ganging the outputs - that's really only required if you're going to be drawing a large current, and it doesn't sound like your trolley does that. ROSCO (20 years ago, 12-Jan-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
 
  RCX seems outputs different power levels
 
Last night I decided to redesign my point to point trolley program. I decided to connect the three RCX outputs in parallel (as suggested by some of LDCC documentation). I also decided to use one of sensor inputs to set the power setting. When I (...) (20 years ago, 12-Jan-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
 
  New NQC API for RCX-Spybot or RCX-RC communication
 
Recently I happened across the MindScript headers for the RCX in the SDK and saw some interesting macros for RCX communication. I decided to port them to NQC and possibly add them to the official built-in NQC API. I would be extremely grateful if (...) (20 years ago, 12-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
 
  Re: NQC API for the new Swan firmware
 
(...) I would in this case prefer the second - I actually use a "kMyNamedConstant" convention in my code, and find it very nice to have the API constants very easily seperable from my constants. (...) Again, personally I would prefer that, as it (...) (20 years ago, 11-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
 
  NQC API for the new Swan firmware
 
I am working feverishly on updates to NQC which will include extensions to the built-in API in support of Dick Swan's new firmware. My intent is to be consistent with the existing NQC API. However, there are some issues I am debating and I would (...) (20 years ago, 11-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
 
  Re: LNPd keeps sending TX_FAILURE
 
(...) Here is my ls -l: tyler@gyro life $ ls -l /dev/ttyS0 lr-xr-xr-x 1 root root 5 Jan 9 05:01 /dev/ttyS0 -> tts/0 tyler@gyro life $ ls -l /dev/tts/0 crw-rw---- 1 tyler tty 4, 64 Jan 9 11:17 /dev/tts/0 I've tried running as root and as tyler, (...) (20 years ago, 9-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Re: LNPd keeps sending TX_FAILURE
 
(...) hmmm, bad. I never did much wich lnp, but it worked on my machine. (...) I hope so :) Reading the problem description in your first posting gives me a knot in my brain. Next possible problem is a problem with the rights for your /dev/ttySx. If (...) (20 years ago, 8-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Re: LNPd keeps sending TX_FAILURE
 
(...) I tried the PARENB | PARODD fix. All it did was prevent the PC from receiving anything from the RCX, and it still didn't send anything. Is there anything I missed? (20 years ago, 7-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Re: LNPd keeps sending TX_FAILURE
 
(...) Keep in mind that lnpd out of the box does _not_ work with brickOS out of the box! This item was discussed in this forum several times, you should search for lnpd in older postings. The next version of brickOS will be accompanied by an updated (...) (20 years ago, 7-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Re: LNPd keeps sending TX_FAILURE
 
I don't use LNPd or BrickOS so I don't know if this will work. It makes all sorts of problems go away when using the RCX ROM message handling routines, I don't know how much of the ROM routines are used by LNPd or whether, if it doesn't, it has (...) (20 years ago, 7-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Re: Robolab Documentation
 
The replacement firmware has several modes for displaying the clock. HH.MM, MM.SS and M.SS.S. The first format is the Lego standard whcih I find failry uninformative. The clock is reset to zero whenever RCX is powered up although many IDE's reset it (...) (20 years ago, 7-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
 
  Re: NQC 1.0 compatibility mode
 
(...) I know I got stung with it when I first installed the IDE, not having it woulda saved me a couple of posts to Lugnet :) ROSCO (20 years ago, 7-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
 
  Re: NQC 1.0 compatibility mode
 
(...) I think if they need NQC V1, they won't have this new IDE. If they have the new IDE, they won't have NQC V1.x (20 years ago, 7-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
 
  Re: Robolab Documentation
 
(...) based on a question that I asked back on Dec 11: "I followed instructions replacing firmware.txt with the replacement file as instructed. The download went smoothly,immediately upon finishing (two beeps) the LCD screen started counting in (...) (20 years ago, 7-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
 
  LNPd keeps sending TX_FAILURE
 
I'm running LNPd on Gentoo Linux 2.6.7. Everything seems to work fine except transmitting messages to the RCX. The lnptest application that comes with LNPd keeps reporting a Collision every time it tries to transmit something. It does however (...) (20 years ago, 7-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, FTX)
 
  NQC 1.0 compatibility mode
 
Would anyone miss terribly the NQC 1.x compatibility mode if I were to remove it? At this point it seems like it is a very useless feature, but maybe someone out there is still using the 1.x API. What do you think? John Hansen (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
 
  Re: What does RCX stand for?
 
(...) I know, but it actually isn't translated: Das Gehirn des Robotics Invention Systems ist der RCX, eine Abkürzung für "Robitics Command System". .... Le cerveau du Robotics Invention System est le RCX, qui est l'abréviation de Robotics Command (...) (20 years ago, 5-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
 
  RE: Robolab Documentation
 
Although I shall not consider that as a manual, this is a very good reference book for intro to Robolab. Well, just say intro may not be fair either, as it does include some advanced concepts at the end of the book. It contains useful sample codes, (...) (20 years ago, 5-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR