 | | NQC's future
|
|
I'm very interested in hearing from NQC users what their needs/wishes are for future enhancements. Here's my current list of updates/enhancements that I am working on. 1. Built-in and documented Spybot API. 2. Fast firmware download via USB tower (...) (21 years ago, 2-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| |
| | Broken Mindstorms motors
|
|
We have several broken mindstorms motors. Tw got the shafts broken. Two just stopped turning. So, we decided to steal the shafts from one set to fix the other set. However, putting them back together has stopped the working but shaftless ones from (...) (21 years ago, 2-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: failure in communicaton between RCX & IR Tower
|
|
Nathan, I have done this trouble shooting step, ie. changing the timing. Unfortunately, it did not work. But, thank you though. Well, the a W2Kpro virtual machine approach did not work either... I guess my only alternative will be getting the (...) (21 years ago, 1-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | Re: Opening COM port error
|
|
(...) Tyler, Happy to be of help! Regarding Garbage Collection, I'm not usually one to criticise without being able to suggest a better alternative. In this case, I think most GC systems could be improved by mimicking the concept of "smart pointers" (...) (21 years ago, 30-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.java, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: "Non-Robolab" LabView functions
|
|
(...) Disagree. It's a matter of habitudes. Once you're familiar with the whole environment, you may write extremely complex programs without getting lost. For example, in our recent "Mars-mission" telerobotics project the complete programming -the (...) (21 years ago, 30-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | Re: Robolab, byte codes and assembler
|
|
(...) They do work! But they are usually used with two quadrature outputs (hence the name), while on RCX only one wire is used and the 4 states are encoded as 4 voltages levels. (URL) (Image courtesy Michael Gasperi) The sequence (clockwise) is (...) (21 years ago, 30-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Robolab, byte codes and assembler
|
|
(...) The way I understand it, it's really not the sensor's fault. The RCX and firmware together either can't or doesn't deal with the ambiguous voltage levels sometimes returned during two of the four transitions. If the RCX were fast enough that (...) (21 years ago, 30-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | Re: Robolab, byte codes and assembler
|
|
Could someone explain to me technically why this sort of of problem with the rotation sensor occurs? I know how quadrature shaft encoders are _supposed_ to work, and I can't see why this sort of thing should happen in the first place. >> Mark (21 years ago, 30-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | Re: "Non-Robolab" LabView functions
|
|
(...) Still waiting to hear from Dick about that. (...) I disagree that it's easier to understand and use. Possibly easier to learn or figure out without documentation, up to a point. But ease of learning is not the same as ease of use. Graphical (...) (21 years ago, 30-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | Re: "Non-Robolab" LabView functions
|
|
(...) ---...--->snip I've not had the time yet to analyze the patch. Seems that you replace the first firmware handler. In Robolab the firmware is found under ..ROBOLAB\Engine\RCX1\Text. They simply have changed the extension .lgo to .txt and call (...) (21 years ago, 30-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | WTF: Broken RCX units
|
|
Anyone have or know where I can find broken RCX units for parts? Thanks, Rand (21 years ago, 30-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Opening COM port error
|
|
In lugnet.robotics.rcx.java, Chris Phillips wrote: Hahaha, Your passionate condemnation of GC makes entertaining reading in light of the amount of work I have to do with lejos,Java,C++, etc for my final year undergraduate project. I will certainly (...) (21 years ago, 30-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.java)
|
| |
| | Re: Patched firmware to improve rotation sensor, was Re: Robolab, byte codes and assembler
|
|
(...) It took me some time to figure out why, but you are right, the ambiguous transitions occur only while counting up. What you could do though would be to count +1 while going from state3 to state2_ambiguous, and correct "phantom transition" by (...) (21 years ago, 30-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | math library
|
|
Hello all. About a year ago I researched math functions so I could write some for the RCX. I found some power series functions that work really well. I see another message here posted by "nanobapt" has also posted some functions so I tested his (...) (21 years ago, 29-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | "Non-Robolab" LabView functions
|
|
I've been experimenting with some of the LabView icons available in "Investigator" mode in Robolab (under the "hourglass" item on the outermost menu). They seem to cause some odd behavior sometimes. It seems like it's especially a problem if one of (...) (21 years ago, 30-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | Re: Patched firmware to improve rotation sensor, was Re: Robolab, byte codes and assembler
|
|
(...) Doesn't that mean that at any given count, you could still be off by 1, but now the odds of having an incorrect count are 50-50 instead of about one in 500? (...) There has been some discussion about whether this patch will work with Robolab, (...) (21 years ago, 30-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | Re: Patched firmware to improve rotation sensor, was Re: Robolab, byte codes and assembler
|
|
"Philippe Hurbain" <philohome@free.fr> wrote in message news:Hp4JAs.oK8@lugnet.com... (...) Much to my embarassment, I have to agree with Philippe that the patch doesn't work very well. I try to figure out what went wrong. (...) This is the expected (...) (21 years ago, 29-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | Re: Patched firmware to improve rotation sensor, was Re: Robolab, byte codes and assembler
|
|
(...) <snip> That would be disappointing! I discarded the RIS software very early on. Dick, can you clarify this issue? (21 years ago, 30-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | Re: Patched firmware to improve rotation sensor, was Re: Robolab, byte codes and assembler
|
|
(...) I think RoboLab uses its own firmware, so patching FIRM0328.LGO won't help you unless you use the RIS programming environment. (Or NQC, but that apparently isn't allowed by FIRST?) (...) I've used FIRM0328.LGO with older (version 1.0) RCXes (...) (21 years ago, 29-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | Re: Robolab, byte codes and assembler
|
|
(...) Should be legal, perhaps. But I was just suggesting that before sending him off to try to patch the firmware, he might want to make sure it was legal to do so. Although RIS and RoboLab may not use the same identical firmware, that doesn't (...) (21 years ago, 29-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
