 | | Re: global output control
|
|
"Matthew Miller" <mattdm@mattdm.org> wrote in message news:slrn8kpub3.v5a.....bu.edu... (...) "RevertOutput". (...) I think RevertOutput is fine. I actually wonder how often that call will end being used in user's programs? The InvertOutput command (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: global output control
|
|
(...) ObvertOutput? (24 years ago, 18-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | global output control
|
|
The Scout and RCX 2.0 both support what lego calls "global" control of the outputs. At first I thought the global calls somehow took precedence over normal calls, so I simply made global versions of all the output calls in NQC. However, after (...) (24 years ago, 18-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: legOS 0.2.4 working under WinNT 4(SP5) and Win2K
|
|
"Luis Villa" <liv@duke.edu> wrote in message news:Pine.SOL.3.91.1...uke.edu... (...) This (...) It's a must, Luis... ;-) (...) file (...) Step (...) Strange (famous programming quotation)... ;-) Can I have your modification to test them on my (...) (24 years ago, 17-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: battery life indicator
|
|
(...) All you can figure out is an estimate of the power supply voltage, which I'd guess doesn't correlate all that robustly to battery life. -Kekoa (24 years ago, 17-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | battery life indicator
|
|
Hello, Is there a way to find out the battery life on the RCX in legOS? I checked this group and the documentation, and I can't find this info. Thanks, Nils (24 years ago, 16-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: 1.0 and 1.5 Differences
|
|
(...) This topic has been covered many times before, do a search and you'll see the details. In a nutshell, if you use NQC - not much, don't worry about it. If you use the included programming environment, it expanded and improved it somewhat for (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC or P-Brick script?
|
|
Yes, then I run ATL.exe and specified patch#4 firmware file from lego sdk site. Sorry for delay in response. "Michael Jorgensen" <jorgensen@iprimus.ca> wrote in message news:Fw3qv9.EHo@lugnet.com... (...) SDK? (...) is (...) also (...) wandering (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: legOS 0.2.4 working under WinNT 4(SP5) and Win2K
|
|
(...) Right, I understood that part, but I geuss that I understood that you meant uploading via some other method besides firmdl3/dll. Sorry, yesterday was not a good day for my brain ... Nils (24 years ago, 16-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | 1.0 and 1.5 Differences
|
|
Hi List , What are the differences from RIS 1.0 to RIS 1.5 ? Jeronimo (24 years ago, 16-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: legOS 0.2.4 working under WinNT 4(SP5) and Win2K
|
|
(...) I've noted that in bash under cygnwin, you need to type: ./firmdl3 ../boot/legos.srec and ./dll ../demo/helloworld.lx Bye, Paolo. --- Those of you who think you know everything are annoying those of us who do. (24 years ago, 16-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: legOS 0.2.4 working under WinNT 4(SP5) and Win2K
|
|
When I said "Command Prompt", I meant the Windows MS DOS (formerly) command prompt. When I said "Cygwin", I meant the bash command prompt gotten by executing the Cygwin B20 program. So, when I say "upload using the Command Prompt", I meant I had to (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Help needed: Problems setting up the IR tower
|
|
Yes, I did but it didn´t work either... (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: legOS 0.2.4 working under WinNT 4(SP5) and Win2K
|
|
(...) What do you mean by 'upload using the Cmd Prompt'? Nils (24 years ago, 15-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Temporarily out
|
|
I am changing jobs so am a little distracted. I have not given up but it will be a few weeks before I get back to the serial stuff. (24 years ago, 15-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: legOS 0.2.4 working under WinNT 4(SP5) and Win2K
|
|
(...) My fault. (...) Personal choice, here. I keep several versions on my machine, and since I created the tarballs, it says 0.2.4. If that breaks the cygwin installs, well, then, I guess I'll change it :( (...) Paolo? This is your area of (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | legOS 0.2.4 working under WinNT 4(SP5) and Win2K
|
|
First, many thanks to those who have worked so hard to make this happen. And to those who kept trying to answer all of my questions while trying to install the previous versions. As the subject suggests, I've got legOS working under both my Win NT (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: rotation sensor problem, again...
|
|
(...) On second thought, this need not be the case. Maybe the initial sensor state starts out at whatever value it normally starts out at after bootup (probably zero), and simply never gets set (or reset) to the state indicated by looking at the (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: rotation sensor problem, again...
|
|
(...) That you see values -1, 2, and 1 sounds like the current state of the rotation sensor is not considered when when the sensor is reset, like it is reset to a state of 0 when it should be reset to the current state of the sensor, like 0, 1, 2, (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC 2.x event processing
|
|
(...) <snip> Dave, Been out of town, and will look more at your messages this weekend. Thanks for the feedback. -- Gordon (24 years ago, 15-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
