 | | Re: Compiling NQC
|
|
(...) Of course, I did not mean to imply she is off course. (...) > > (...) (25 years ago, 29-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | IS free()'s operation atomic?
|
|
Hi all I think that free() operation in mm.c is not ISR safe in multitasking mode. This operation is not keep coherence about value of mm_first_free,is it? ---...--- in mm.c ---...--- // for task safe operations, free needs to be // atomic and (...) (25 years ago, 29-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Compiling NQC
|
|
Well what do you know...I install gcc 2.8.0 and still no luck. But a clue lurks in the docs....and since I had none (clues that is) I read on. To compile c++ you must install libstdc 2.8.0. I find it and compile into gcc. Just for luck I grab the (...) (25 years ago, 29-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | NQC 1.3 has been released
|
|
I just posted NQC 1.3 to the main web site: (URL) an excerpt from the readme... version 1.3 ---...--- Calls to inline function may now be made before their definition. abs() and sign() operators added. SetWatch() added to rcx.nqh. Toggle() added to (...) (25 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: Compiling NQC
|
|
I will pull gcc down tonight and try a fresh install...the gcc installation that came with openlinux is what I installed, and I am seeing make problems elsewhere now. Rich Thompson rich_thompson@cmcsmart.com (URL) -----Original Message----- (...) (25 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Compiling NQC
|
|
Rich Thompson <richone@midsouth.rr.com> wrote in message news:FAvu5G.4Hw@lugnet.com... (...) This sounds like gcc isn't installed properly. cc1plus is the first stage of the compiler. Can you compile anything properly? alex (25 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Compiling NQC
|
|
I am delving into the world of Linux (I have abandoned BSD and Windows but keeping my Mac) and I am having trouble compiling NQC in Caldera's OpenLinux 2.2 for i386. A basic output of the errors I am seeing: gcc -c -O6 -pipe -m486 -Iplatform (...) (25 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Typo
|
|
(...) NQC 1.3 is pretty minor... inline functions can be used before they are defined. I added abs() and sign() support. Technically they are not functions, but are operators with a function syntax (like sizeof in C). A couple new functions (...) (25 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Typo
|
|
Can you give us a "press release" about what's new in 1.3? (...) Joel Shafer joel@connect.net (25 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Typo
|
|
Thanks - I had already noticed that and fixed it in the upcoming 1.3 release, which has been "ready to go" for about 3 weeks now. I just have to take the time to do all of the platform builds, update the web site, etc. Dave (...) (25 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Typo
|
|
In browsing the rcx.nqh file, I found that the SMODE_CELSIUS input mode constant is misspelled with a 'c' instead of an 's'. Jonathan (25 years ago, 27-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: RcxCC Help!
|
|
William: Do you have the official Mindstorms software loaded that came with the RCX? Most of the 3rd party programs need the main program loaded inorder for their program to run properly. Hope this helps... Best Regards, Patrick McLean William Ng (...) (25 years ago, 26-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: RcxCC Help!
|
|
OH! i forgot i need to install the mindstorm software before i use RcxCC!! now it works, sorry guys. (...) (25 years ago, 26-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | RcxCC Help!
|
|
i downloaded the RcxCC version 2.2 and extracted it with winzip. when i try to run the RcxCC.EXE, my system say "Exception EOleSysError in module RcxCC.EXE at 00053AF9. Class not registered" does anyone know what it is and what can i do?? thanks in (...) (25 years ago, 26-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Rom sensor read routine
|
|
In writing some sensor code yesterday/today (it's 6 am), I passed over the ROM sensor code at 14c0. The documentation has been put in the usual place. The rotation code is pretty simple: the expected state machine, with split points between the four (...) (25 years ago, 25-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: legOS Network Protocol
|
|
(...) given (...) lego (...) [ stuff about lego/native collisions ] (...) of a (...) on (...) I was wondering, since people are considering using tags in the LNP frame to signify local to local messages, could we not also use this to "label" non (...) (25 years ago, 23-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: loading s/w
|
|
(...) In my brief experimentation with rom_reset(), it does not actually clear the rom- rather it only starts the program over again (in main()). Is this intentional? I get this behavior when calling it from main- when calling it from within another (...) (25 years ago, 21-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Rotation sensor bug found
|
|
(...) This seems the best approach to me too. My problem is I don't know if I am able to do such a thing :-) (...) I know your site and know you've done a LOT of hard work to understand and explain both RCX hardware and original firmware code. Mario (25 years ago, 21-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: loading s/w
|
|
(...) That's what I am doing. Markus. (25 years ago, 21-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: legOS Network Protocol
|
|
(...) Hmm.. with a little hacking you could certainly detect logic errors. The main problem I think would be writing alternative C-Functions for the H8 assembler, which makes up legOS itself. You'd also need to create a simulator engine for legOS to (...) (25 years ago, 21-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
