Subject:
|
Re: GCC 2.8.1 for HC11
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.handyboard
|
Date:
|
Tue, 30 Mar 1999 17:32:08 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Ken Hornstein <KENH@CMF.NRL.NAVY.spamcakeMIL>
|
Viewed:
|
898 times
|
| |
| |
> I haven't played yet with the cross-assembler or the linker, just the
> compiler itself. It generates HC11 assembly code.
Another question: _which_ cross-assembler does it use? The one based on
the ASXXXX cross-assembler (the so-called "Baldwin assembler") or another
one?
There are some bogosities that I know about with the ASXXXX cross-assembler/
linker. It's still usable, but I had to whack on it a lot to get it
to handle libraries. I mean no disrespect to the author, but perhaps in
the long run it would be better to do a proper BDF target for it and
use the GNU tools.
> Anybody else here familiar enough with GCC sources to do a quick review of
> the VERY minor changes?
Not me, unfortunately. Oh, does the current cross-compiler still use
the pseudo-register hack? That was something I always wanted to go back
and fix properly.
--Ken
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: GCC 2.8.1 for HC11
|
| (...) In the xasm/doc directory it says "ASxxxx Cross Assemblers, Version 1.1, June 1990. Submitted by Alan R. Baldwin, Kent State University". I guess that's your answer. Let me know a better route to follow for the assembler/linker please. (...) (...) (25 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: GCC 2.8.1 for HC11
|
| (...) Ken's comments made me look at it again: Gcc-2.6.3+HC11 now compiles fine for me on Solaris 2.5, but I know I had trouble compiling it on Red Hat Linux 5.2. I would go back and check that configuration one more time but for the fact that I now (...) (25 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|