Subject:
|
Re: GCC 2.8.1 for HC11
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.handyboard
|
Date:
|
Mon, 29 Mar 1999 20:00:55 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Curt Mills, WE7U <hacker@tc.fluke.comAVOIDSPAM>
|
Viewed:
|
790 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
On Sun, 28 Mar 1999, Ken Hornstein wrote:
> How come you didn't simply use the 2.6.3 cross-compiler? I doubt the
> optimizer is improved _that_ much for the HC11.
'Cuz I couldn't get it to compile. I suppose I could have tried some
other flavors of Linux, or Solaris, but I'd rather start from something
newer, therefore the excitement in finding a new port.
> core functionality. But anyway, yes, you have my permission to
> adapt those libraries to the Handyboard.
Thanks a bunch! I think... Once it is done that means I get to answer
questions, so I suppose maybe I'm not that thrilled anymore... :-(
Current status: The complete build tree has been posted to the MSOE web
site, and I managed to snag it yesterday (13.5 MB!). It is a DJGPP build
tree (DOS GCC compiler), so I'm currently struggling with how to convert
the changes over to a generic gcc-2.8.1 source tree. So far it configures
ok (as far as I can tell), but won't compile (on Linux or Solaris). I'm
working on it.
If anyone wants to have GCC for an HC11 on DOS, it's all there for you
already.
Curt Mills, WE7U hacker.NO_*SPAM@tc.fluke.com
Senior Methods Engineer/SysAdmin
"Lotto: A tax on people who are bad at math." -- unknown
"Windows: Microsoft's tax on computer illiterates." -- WE7U
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: GCC 2.8.1 for HC11
|
| (...) I'm extrememly surprised. It was sort of a no-brainer when I did it and I've never had a problem on any number of weird systems. Please keep us updated. --Ken (25 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: GCC 2.8.1 for HC11
|
| (...) How come you didn't simply use the 2.6.3 cross-compiler? I doubt the optimizer is improved _that_ much for the HC11. (...) It was a while ago, and I don't remember how much of Carlos's work is left. It all had to be converted to the new (...) (25 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
11 Messages in This Thread: ![Re: HB Memory -handyboard@media.mit.edu (Stefano Falconetti) (26-Mar-99 to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![GCC 2.8.1 for HC11 -handyboard@media.mit.edu (Curt Mills, WE7U) (26-Mar-99 to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: GCC 2.8.1 for HC11 -handyboard@media.mit.edu (Ken Hornstein) (29-Mar-99 to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: GCC 2.8.1 for HC11 -handyboard@media.mit.edu (Ken Hornstein) (29-Mar-99 to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: GCC 2.8.1 for HC11 -handyboard@media.mit.edu (Curt Mills, WE7U) (30-Mar-99 to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: GCC 2.8.1 for HC11 -handyboard@media.mit.edu (Ken Hornstein) (30-Mar-99 to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: GCC 2.8.1 for HC11 -handyboard@media.mit.edu (Curt Mills, WE7U) (30-Mar-99 to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: GCC 2.8.1 for HC11 -handyboard@media.mit.edu (Ken Hornstein) (30-Mar-99 to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: GCC 2.8.1 for HC11 -handyboard@media.mit.edu (Curt Mills, WE7U) (30-Mar-99 to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: GCC 2.8.1 for HC11 -handyboard@media.mit.edu (Ken Hornstein) (30-Mar-99 to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|